TSUCHIDA, Shoji |
---|
Faculty, Department/Institute
- Faculty of Safety Science Department of Safety Management
Academic status (qualification)
- Professor Apr. 1,1997
Position
- 2023/4/1~2024/3/31
- 2023/4/1~2024/3/31
Undergraduate Degrees・University
- The University of TokyoDepartment of Social Psychology 1980 Graduated
Graduate Degrees・University
- The University of Tokyo Doctor's Degree Program 1986 ABD- Coursework completed
Academic Degrees
- Master of Sociology Mar. 1982 The University of Tokyo
Homepage Address, E-mail Address
- Homepage Address:https://wps.itc.kansai-u.ac.jp/tsuchida/
- E-mail Address:tsuchida@kansai-u.ac.jp
Research fields
Research fields | keyword |
---|---|
Disaster informations | risk communication;risk perception;ANZEN (safety) psychology |
Social psychology | risk assessment by human;consensus communication;care communication |
Research topics
research topic | People's response to Covid-19 in Japan and the world |
---|---|
Study theme state | Joint Research within Institution |
research duration | 2020 ~ 2023 |
Research Programs | Joint Research |
keyword | COVID-19,COVID-19 Vaccination,risk communciation,People Flow,Social Networking Service (SNS) |
Research field | Social psychology |
Research Topics Overview | 新型コロナウイルス感染症流行ならびにワクチン接種に対する日本の人々の反応を2020年8月から継続的に2022年6月まで6回にわたりオンライン質問紙調査により明らかにしている。 |
research topic | Determinants of panic and craze in disasters in China |
---|---|
Study theme state | International Joint Research |
research duration | 2018 ~ 2023 |
Research Programs | Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research |
keyword | panic in disasters,experiment with virtual reality,social survey,People's Republic of Chjna,Thailand |
Research field | |
Research Topics Overview | 日本やアメリカでは災害時パニック現象が発生したとの報告はないが、中国では、災害時パニック現象が報道されている。中国における災害時パニックならびに災害時クレーズの誘発要因とその発生メカニズムを、広瀬(2004)やSmelser(1962)などの理論を援用して明らかする。南京大学など中国の複数の大学の学生および近隣住民、ならびに関西大学など日本の大学の学生を対象として、パニックおよびクレーズを生じさせる個人的傾向性、状況的要因、文化的要因についての質問紙調査を実施する。次に、シーナカリヌィートと(バンコク)チェンマイ大学、関西大学などにおいて、学生を対象にパニックならびにクレーズの誘発要因を確認するVR(バーチャルリアリティ)を活用した実験室心理実験を行う。[新型コロナウイルス感染症流行により中国への入国が困難であるため実験研究をタイにおいて実施することに変更した。]この知見は、将来に日本社会が変質した場合や想定外の災害発生時に、日本においても災害時にパニックあるいは略奪行為などのクレーズが発生しうるのかの予測に役立てることができる。 |
Research Activities
- I have studied on the attitude structures affecting human decision-making. My present interest is in the researches on decision-making processes at risk situations, risk perception, and risk communication, especially in the field of public acceptance of Science & Technology and of disasters & accidents in general. I have been engaged in a “Communication Field” Study which aims to nullify the barriers between nuclear experts that are so called “GENSHIRYOKU-MURA (Atomic Energy Community)” and citizens, and a research to investigate risk perception of the Chinese youth, a research on the leadership of governments at the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011, and so on. Now, I research in panic behaviors in disasters in China and people’s responses to Covid-19 and its vaccine. I also committed to the activities of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). A research fellow of Kennedy School, Harvard University in 2014; Councilor, The Society for Risk analysis (SRA) in 2016-2019; President, SRA-Asia in 2019-2022; Director, Atomic Energy Society of Japan in 2018-2022.
Research Career
- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Human Sciences, Osaka University 1987/1/1~1989年/3/31
- Lecture, School of Arts and Letters, Meiji University 1989/4/1~1992年/3/31
- Associate Professor, School of Arts and Letters, Meiji University 1992/4/1~1997年/3/31
- Professor, Faculty of Sociology, Kansai University 1997/4/1~2010年/3/31
- Professor, Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University
Awards
- The Japanese Psychological Association Award Sep. 6,1999(The Japanese Psychological Association)
- The Award of the Society Nov. 19,2011(The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan)
- The Japan Association of Applied Psychology Award Aug. 14,2013(The Japan Association of Applied Psychology)
- Presidential Merit Award Dec. 2018(The Society for Risk Analysis)
- Fellow Award Dec. 2020(The Society for Risk Analysis)
Academic Associations
所属学会・団体名 | 役職名 (役職在任期間) |
---|---|
The Japanese Psychological Association | representative(2007/~2009/) |
The Japanese Society of Social Psychology | Councilor(1999/~2001/), Editorial committee Member(1999/~2003/), Councilor(2003/~2007/) |
The Japanese Group Dynamics Association | Councilor(2007/~2008/) |
Behaviormetric Society of Japan | Editorial Board Member(2002/~2008/) |
The Japan Association of Applied Psychology | |
The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan | Councilor(2000/~2004/), General Secretary(2004/~2008/), Vice-President(2004/~2006/), President(2006/~2008/), Chair, Awards Committee(2022/~2024/) |
Japan Association for Consumer Studies | Councilor(1994/~2005/), Area Editor(1998/~2006/), Vice-President(2005/~2007/), President(2007/~2009/), Vice-President(2009/~2011/) |
The Society for Risk Analysis | Councilor(2016/12/~2019/12/), Fellow(2020/12/) |
Atomic Energy Society of Japan | (2012/10/~2015/3/), co-chair, Subcommittee "Social and Environmental"(2015/4/~2016/3/), Chair, Subcommittee "Social and Environmental"(2016/4/~2022/3/), Director(2018/6/~2022/6/) |
The Asian Regional Organization of the Society for Risk Analysis | President(2020/3/3~2022/11/18), Past-President(2022/11/18~2024/11/27) |
Japan Society for Disaster Information Studies | |
Japan Health Physics Society | 20201002(2022/3/31) |
Joint Projects/Commissioned Projects
1983 - 1984 International Joint Research
1983 - 1985 Domestic Joint Research
1983 - 1986 Other
1983 - 1986 Domestic Joint Research- The sociological Study of Psychological Effects of Occupational and Educational Self-direction
1986 - 1987 Domestic Joint Research - Social strativication and social mobility survey
1987 - 1989 Domestic Joint Research - Risk perception and attitudes toward energy and technology in the US, Japan, and France
1991 - 1995 International Joint Research - Development & research in covariance structure analysis
1992 - 1993 Domestic Joint Research - Social surveys on people's perception to nuclear energy
1992 - 1996 Joint research collaboration between industry and academia
1994 - 2000 Domestic Joint Research
1996 - 2002 Domestic Joint Research- Mind control problem among university students
1997 - 1999 Domestic Joint Research - Researches on human and social relation problems
1988 - 1989 Joint Research on campus - Zero-risk perceptions and cognitive structures of attitudes toward nuclear power plants
1999 - 2000 Joint research collaboration between industry and academia
2001 - 2002 Joint Research on campus- International comparison of risk perception and human attitude-structures
2002 - 2003 International Joint Research
2003 - 2004 Domestic Joint Research- Integration of scientific expertise into media-based public discourses
2004 - 2007 International Joint Research
2006 - 2007 Domestic Joint Research
2006 - 2010 Domestic Joint Research- Risk communication on nuclear power
2007 - 2008 Joint research collaboration between industry and academia
2008 - 2009 Domestic Joint Research
2008 - 2009 Joint Research on campus
2008 - 2014 Domestic Joint Research
2010 - 2011 Joint research collaboration between industry and academia- Risk perception of university students in China
2011 - 2015 International Joint Research
2011 - 2021 From contract research companies
2015 - 2016 Domestic Joint Research- A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Responding to Disaster Related Migration
2016 - 2018 International Joint Research - Determinants of Panic and Craze at Disasters in China
2018 - 2022 International Joint Research - Problem of information flow in the society and citizens’ behaviors with Covid-19
2020 - 2021 Joint Research on campus
Research Publications
No. | Type of publication | Date of publication (Date of presentation) | Title | Type of research result | Jointly authored or single authored | Publisher and journal name | Volume number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Papers1 | 2023/6/9~2023,06,09,,, | A Case Study of Disaster Risk Reduction in Schools for the Blind in Thailand | Academic Journal | Co-author | International Journal of Disaster Response and Emergency Management | Vol. 6, No. 1, Pp. 1-14 |
2 | International academic conference8 | 2022/12/5~2022,12,05,,, | A case study of disaster risk analysis in Schools for blind in Thailand | ||||
3 | International academic conference8 | 2022/11/18~2022,11,18,,, | The Japanese response to COVID -19 pandemic and its vaccination | Single-Author | |||
4 | Commentary9 | 2022/11/1~2022,11,01,,, | What is RISK COMMUNICATION in the field of atomic energy use? | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan | Vol.64, No.11, 644-645. |
5 | Papers1 | 2022/9/26~2022,09,26,,, | Changes in response of the Japanese to COVID-19 and its vaccine till October 2021 | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis | 32(1), 43-56 |
6 | Papers1 | 2022/3/31~2022,03,31,,, | Changes in people’s minds about COVID-19: Focus on the risk perception of Vaccination | In-house publication | Co-authored | Journal of Societal Safety Sciences | Vol. 12, 47-59 |
7 | Papers1 | 2022/3/31~2022,03,31,,, | Return migration after Disasters: A Case study of 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident | In-house publication | Co-authored | Journal of Societal Safety Science | Vol. 12, 73-81 |
8 | International academic conference8 | 2022/3/23~2022,03,23,,, | Ethical and societal considerations associated with future generations in the application of the concepts of tolerability and reasonableness | Other | Single-Author | ||
9 | Papers1 | 2022/2/20~2022,02,20,,, | People’s response to Covid-19 vaccination | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Faculty of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University (ed.), “Investigation: COVID-19 disaster”, Minerva-Shobo | 230-247 |
10 | Papers1 | 2021/12/25~2021,12,25,,, | Response of the Japanese to COVID-19 till August 2020 | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis | 31 (2), 79-88 |
11 | Papers1 | 2021/4~2021,04,00,,, | How and what did the Japanese people react to Covid-19 pandemic on August 2020? | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Kansai Univ.(ed.), Covid-19 pandemic drived the public into mayhem, so Kansai Univ. tried to consider on it, Naniwa-sha | 88-101 |
12 | Papers1 | 2021/3~2021,03,00,,, | Summary Report on Actual Situation of Overseas Japanese under COVID-19 Crisis | In-house publication | Co-authored | Journal of Societal Safety Sciences | vol. 11, 125-136 |
13 | Papers1 | 2021/3~2021,03,00,,, | Risk perception and attitude formation of Covid-19 vaccine in December 2020: Online questionnaire survey with 2,500 respondents | In-house publication | Co-authored | Journal of Societal Safety Sciences | vol. 11, 137-150 |
14 | International academic conference8 | 2020/12/14~2020,12,14,,, | Chinese Panic Behaviors in Earthquakes | Other | International coauthorship | ||
15 | Papers1 | 2020/3~2020,03,00,,, | Transition of the Concept of Vulnerable People at Disaster and Proposal of the Capability approach for the Vulnerable People | In-house publication | Co-authored | Journal of Societal Safety Sciences | vol. 10, 3-13 |
16 | International academic conference8 | 2020/1/12~2020,01,12,,, | Safety and Risk in Social Psychological Perspective | Other | Single-Author | ||
17 | Keynote address20 | 2019/10/17~2019,10,17,,, | Human Behaviors in Emergency: Panic in disasters in China | Other | Single-Author | ||
18 | International academic conference8 | 2019/9/13~2019,09,13,,, | Crisis Communication at Fukushima NPP Accident in 2011 | Other | Single-Author | ||
19 | International academic conference8 | 2019/7/29~2019,07,29,,, | Panic behaviors in disasters in China | Other | Single-Author | ||
20 | Chapter or Section5 | 2019/6~2019,06,00,,, | Risk Ccommunication | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | 208-211 | |
21 | Chapter or Section5 | 2019/6~2019,06,00,,, | Risk Perception and Heuristics | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | 216-219 | |
22 | Papers1 | 2019~2019,00,00,,, | Contemporary Societies and Risk | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Abe, S., Ozawa, M., Kawata, Y.(eds.), Science of Societal Safety: Living at time of risks and disasters, Springer | 27-36 |
23 | International academic conference8 | 2018/11/15~2018,11,15,,, | People of Fukushima after NPP Disaster | Other | Single-Author | ||
24 | Edited book3 | 2018/9~2018,09,00,,, | Psychology of safety and risk: Safety created by mind | Monograph | Editor | ||
25 | International academic conference8 | 2018/7/30~2018,07,30,,, | God's Altruism: Cultural difference of responsibility for safety | Other | Single-Author | ||
26 | International academic conference8 | 2018/7/18~2018,07,18,,, | Mass Panic phenomena at Disasters in China in comparison to Japan and the US | Other | Single-Author | ||
27 | Keynote address20 | 2018/3/14~2018,03,14,,, | Psychology and Risk Analysis | Other | Single-Author | ||
28 | International academic conference8 | 2018/3/13~2018,03,13,,, | The effect of metacognition on help-seeking intentions by the scene imagination method: Preliminary survey in high school students | Other | Co-authored | ||
29 | International academic conference8 | 2018/3/13~2018,03,13,,, | A study on Disaster related death associated with the Great East Earthquake in Fukushima Prefecture | Other | Co-authored | ||
30 | International academic conference8 | 2018/3/13~2018,03,13,,, | Attitude of Japanese Citizens toward Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: Risk Perception and Trust | Other | Co-authored | ||
31 | International academic conference8 | 2018/3/13~2018,03,13,,, | Collective Behaviors in War | Other | Single-Author | ||
32 | International academic conference8 | 2017/12/26~2017,12,26,,, | Risk communication at disaster | Other | Single-Author | ||
33 | Papers1 | 2017/12/1~2017,12,01,,, | A study on Disaster-related deaths associated with the Great East Japan Earthquake in Fukushima Prefecture. | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan | Vol. 59, No. 12, 727-731 |
34 | Papers1 | 2017/12~2017,12,00,,, | The Government and TEPCO Problems in Communicationg Information with the Public during the Fukushima-1 NPP Accident. | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | aculty of Societal Safety Sciences(ed.), THE FUKUSHIMA AND TOHOKU DISASTER, Elsevier / Butterworth-Heinemann | pp.287-308 |
35 | International academic conference8 | 2017/5/12~2017,05,12,,, | Learning from the Risk Communications at Fukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident | Other | Single-Author | ||
36 | International academic conference8 | 2017/3/16~2017,03,16,,, | Risk Communications at Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident | Other | Single-Author | ||
37 | International academic conference8 | 2017/1/10~2017,01,10,,, | Investgating Risk Communications by Japanese government at Fukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident | Other | Single-Author | ||
38 | International academic conference8 | 2016/12/12~2016,12,12,,, | Investgating Risk Communication at Fukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident | Other | Single-Author | ||
39 | Papers1 | 2016/3/31~2016,03,31,,, | Social Capital, Mutual Aids in Disasters, and Evaluation on Neighborhood’s Disaster-Preparation: Comparison between the States of Volunteer-Firefighter and the States of Career-Firefighter in the United States | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Safety Science Review | No. 6 |
40 | Papers1 | 2016/3/31~2016,03,31,,, | Risk communication after Fukushima-Daiichi NPP accident | Monograph | Single-Author | Minerva-Shobo | 308-332 |
41 | Papers1 | 2016/3~2016,03,00,,, | Migration intentions and their determinants: Comparison of college students in China and Japan | Academic Journal | International coauthorship | Asian and Pacific Migration Journal | 25(1): 62-84 |
42 | Papers1 | 2016/2/12~2016,02,12,,, | Risk communication and social psychology | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | K. Kondo (ed.) “Legal engineering for practical use of new technologies: Law to respond risks and to secure safety”, Minjiho-Kenkyukai | pp. 135-156 |
43 | Papers1 | 2016/1~2016,01,00,,, | Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Risk Analysis | Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 98-113 |
44 | Open class14 | 2015/12/15~2015,12,15,,, | What is Risk Communication? | Other | Single-Author | ||
45 | International academic conference8 | 2015/9/23~2015,09,23,,, | Is important the expected information than the detailed information:The confirmation bias as a determinant of satisfaction for risk communication. | Other | Co-authored | ||
46 | Open class14 | 2015/6/9~2015,06,09,,, | Citizens' risk perception toward nuclear energy | Other | Single-Author | ||
47 | Open class14 | 2014/12/9~2014,12,09,,, | Social Capital, Mutual Aids in Disasters, and Evaluation on Neighborhood’s Disaster-Preparation: Comparison between the States of Volunteer-Firefighter and the States of Career-Firefighter in the United States. | Other | Co-authored | ||
48 | Papers1 | 2014/9~2014,09,00,,, | Periodical public opinion survey on nuclear energy (Inhabitants living in the Tokyo metropolitan area) | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan | vol. 13, No. 3, 94-112 |
49 | International academic conference8 | 2014/7/13~2014,07,13,,, | Effects of risk judgment tendency on the language representation of risk at The Tohoku Disaster: A comparison between Japanese and American | Other | Co-authored | ||
50 | Papers1 | 2014/7/9~2014,07,09,,, | Comparative research on NIMBY risk acceptability between Chinese and Japanese college students | Academic Journal | International coauthorship | Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | Vol. 186, No. 10: 6683-6694 |
51 | Papers1 | 2014/4~2014,04,00,,, | A communication method beyond the gap between citizens and experts (1): Psychological barrier between them shown by social surveys | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan | Vol. 56, No. 4, 245-249 |
52 | Commentary9 | 2014/4~2014,04,00,,, | Do we need robots with "KOKORO (ego / mind)"? | Other | Co-authored chapter | ||
53 | Papers1 | 2014/3/15~2014,03,15,,, | Risk perception and behaviors of the Japanese after the North-East Japan Disaster 2011 | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Safety Science for Prevention and Mitigation against Natural Disasters", Minerva-Shobo. | 65-80 |
54 | Chapter or Section5 | 2013/12~2013,12,00,,, | Attitude | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | The Japanses Society for Cognitive Psycholoy (ed.) Handbook of cognitive psychology, Yuhikaku | 308-309 |
55 | Papers1 | 2013/11~2013,11,00,,, | The relation among intragroup relational cognition, collective efficacy, and the civic intention of participation and acceptance in the community: A questionnaire study in Nara | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Japanese Journal of Social Psychology | vol. 29, No. 2, 113-119 |
56 | Open class14 | 2013/5/31~2013,05,31,,, | Japanese Citizens’ Risk Perception toward Nuclear Power | Other | Single-Author | ||
57 | Open class14 | 2013/5/31~2013,05,31,,, | Japanese citizens’ risk perception toward nuclear power | Other | Single-Author | ||
58 | Papers1 | 2013/4~2013,04,00,,, | What the public want in nuclear use | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Journal of the Hear Transfer Society of Japan | Vol. 52, No. 219: 61-67 |
59 | Research report21 | 2013/3/26~2013,03,26,,, | Studies for Crossing over from Community of Nuclear Experts; (1) Concept of Studies | Other | Co-authored | ||
60 | Research report21 | 2013/3/26~2013,03,26,,, | Studies for Crossing over from Community of Nuclear Experts; (2) Outline of the social surveys and their results | Other | Co-authored | ||
61 | Research report21 | 2013/3/26~2013,03,26,,, | Studies for Crossing over from Community of Nuclear Experts; (3) Design for "forum" | Other | Co-authored | ||
62 | Papers1 | 2013/3/25~2013,03,25,,, | Social psychology of accidents | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Safety Science for Accident Prevention and Mitigation", Minerva-Shobo | 182-198 |
63 | Papers1 | 2013/3/11~2013,03,11,,, | Comparing disaster perception in Japan and the US | Other | Co-authored | S. Ikeda & Y. Maeda (eds.) "Emerging Issues Learned from the 3.11 Disaster as Multiple Events of Earthquake, Tsunami and Fukushima Nuclear Accident", The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan | Pp. 59-61 |
64 | Papers1 | 2013/3~2013,03,00,,, | Risk Literacy and Risk Perception among Undergraduates in China: Case of BSE | Academic Journal | International coauthorship | Human and Ecological Risk Assessment | vol. 19, No. 2: 526-537 |
65 | Papers1 | 2012/12~2012,12,00,,, | Crisis communication at NPP-Fukushima1 accident | Academic Journal | Co-authored chapter | The Thermal and Nuclear Power | No. 675(Vol. 63, No. 12): 38-43 |
66 | Academic presentation7 | 2012/11/18~2012,11,18,,, | Cohesiveness of community | Other | Co-authored | ||
67 | Academic presentation7 | 2012/11/11~2012,11,11,,, | Effects of risk estimation tendency on risk perception at The Tohoku Disaster | Other | Co-authored | ||
68 | Lecture19 | 2012/11/10~2012,11,10,,, | Researches in SRA-Japan | Other | Single-Author | ||
69 | Academic presentation7 | 2012/11/10~2012,11,10,,, | Changes in attitude structure toward nuclear power in the nuclear power plant locations of Tohoku district | Other | Co-authored | ||
70 | Papers1 | 2012/11~2012,11,00,,, | Deperminants of trust in goverment with regard to nuclear power: The role of political collective efficacy and perception of civic social relationships | Academic Journal | Co-authored | The Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology | Vol. 28, No. 2: 99-105 |
71 | Papers1 | 2012/10/31~2012,10,31,,, | Production and application of consumer research | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Advancers in Consumer Studies | Vol. 19, No. 1, 77-89 |
72 | Keynote address20 | 2012/10/28~2012,10,28,,, | The disster 3.11 in Japan: Resilience in Tohoku compared with the US | Other | Single-Author | ||
73 | International academic conference8 | 2012/7/19~2012,07,19,,, | Comparing Disaster Perceptions in Japan and the US | Other | Co-authored | ||
74 | International academic conference8 | 2012/6/3~2012,06,03,,, | Community and resilience in Tohoku, Japan after the disaster 3.11. | Other | |||
75 | Papers1 | 2012/6~2012,06,00,,, | What is risk communication?: A suggestion by safety psychology | Academic Journal | Single-Author | The Japanese Journal of Health Behavioral Science | Vol. 27: 10-19 |
76 | Lecture19 | 2012/5/15~2012,05,15,,, | Community and resilience in Tohoku, Japan after the disaster 3.11 | Other | Single-Author | 2nd Annual Asia Public Policy Forum: Disaster Management in Asia [Singapore] | |
77 | Commentary9 | 2012/3/31~2012,03,31,,, | The Fukushima accident and crisis communication | In-house publication | Single-Author | Safety Science Review | Vol. 2: 14-15 |
78 | Papers1 | 2012/3/31~2012,03,31,,, | A report of a pilot implementation of Tutorial English classes at the Faculty of Safety Science: a two-part survey based on questionnaire-results | In-house publication | Co-authored | Safety Science Review | Vol. 2: 127-138 |
79 | Papers1 | 2012/3~2012,03,00,,, | Crisis communication at the Fukushima accident and the concept of crisis management | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan | Vol. 54, No. 3: 181-183 |
80 | Papers1 | 2012/3~2012,03,00,,, | Affective heuristic and linguistic representation in risk perception & judgment | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers | Vol. 76 (No. 787): 374-383 |
81 | Papers1 | 2012/3~2012,03,00,,, | Eff ect of ingroup entitativity on attitude toward risk plants | In-house publication | Co-authored | Safety Science Review | vol. 2, 49-57 |
82 | Papers1 | 2012/2/10~2012,02,10,,, | Citizens', consumers', and foreigners' responses to the Fukushima accident | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Investgating the North-East Japan Disaster 2011", Minerva-Shobo | 253-277 |
83 | International academic conference8 | 2011/12/6~2011,12,06,,, | Calm panic of the Japanese against the complex disaster 3-11. | Other | Single-Author | ||
84 | 99 | 2011/12~2011,12,00,,, | Mechanism of human risk perception | Other | Single-Author | Proceedings of safety science seminar 2010 (Graduate School of Safety Science, Kansai University) | 128-138 |
85 | Lecture19 | 2011/11/11~2011,11,11,,, | Crisis communication at the NNP-Fukushima-1 accident | Other | Single-Author | ||
86 | International academic conference8 | 2011/11/8~2011,11,08,,, | Crisis Communication & Management in the Fukushima Accident | Other | Single-Author | ||
87 | International academic conference8 | 2011/7/31~2011,07,31,,, | Factors influencing the motivation for considering nuclear power generation | Other | Co-authored | ||
88 | International academic conference8 | 2011/7/31~2011,07,31,,, | The effect of in-group entitativity on the collective efficacy and intention of activity in maintaining university safety | Other | Co-author | ||
89 | International academic conference8 | 2011/7/27~2011,07,27,,, | Crisis communication at the Fukushima accident. (IN Panel Session "Impact to the Society") | Other | Single-Author | ||
90 | Book2 | 2011/7/10~2011,07,10,,, | Introduction to data-analysis for social surveys: Invitation to empirical sciences, New edition | Monograph | Co-authored | Yuhikaku | 1-296 |
91 | Chapter or Section5 | 2011/6/30~2011,06,30,,, | "attitude scales", "attitude change" | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | K. Ninomiya & M. Koyasu (eds.), "Key-Word-Collection in Social Psychology", Shin-yo-sha | 102-109 |
92 | Keynote address20 | 2011/6/23~2011,06,23,,, | Human risk perception and linguistic representation | Other | Single-Author | ||
93 | Keynote address20 | 2011/6/12~2011,06,12,,, | Risk communication | Other | Single-Author | ||
94 | Papers1 | 2011/4~2011,04,00,,, | Effects of perceptions of the necessities and anxieties associated with nuclear power on motivation for considering nuclear power generation | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Sociotechnica | Vol. 8: 74-81 |
95 | Lecture19 | 2011/3/22~2011,03,22,,, | How do the Japanese feel and think about the Crisis? | Other | Single-Author | Kennedy School, Harvard University, Disaster Management in Asia Seminar Series [Japan in Crisis: Exploring the onsequences of a Cascading Disaster] [Boston, USA] | |
96 | Book2 | 2011/3/7~2011,03,07,,, | Risk communication | Monograph | Co-authored | Osaka University Press | 1-220 |
97 | Papers1 | 2011/3~2011,03,00,,, | Affect Heuristic with "good-bad" Criterion and Linguistic Representation in Risk Judgments | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Journal of Disaster Research | Vol. 6, No. 2: 219-229 |
98 | Research report21 | 2011/3~2011,03,00,,, | Inter-cultural comparison between Japan and Nederland on risk & benefit perception toward foods | Other | Co-authored chapter | Project Report | 97-99 |
99 | Papers1 | 2011~2011,00,00,,, | Empirical research on risk literacy and perception of undergraduates in mainland China: A case of BSE. | Monograph | International coauthorship | C. Huang,, J. Ortiz and S. Sears(eds.), "Beyond Experience in Risk Analysis and Crisis Response", Atlantis Press | 233-238 |
100 | Commentary9 | 2010/4/26~2010,04,26,,, | Issues and review of risk psychology | Monograph | Co-authored chapter | Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Science of Safety and ANSHIN", Sankei-Shinbun-Shuppan | 41-44 |
101 | Papers1 | 2010/3/31~2010,03,31,,, | The BSE movement and the people's awareness of food safety in the Republic of Korea | In-house publication | Co-authored | Survey & Data Series No. 107 (Interpersonal relations and risks in the contemporary societies), Institute of Economic and Political studies, Kansai University | 1-35 |
102 | Papers1 | 2010/3/29~2010,03,29,,, | Researches at the Society for Risk Analysis, Japan | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis | Vol. 19, No. 4: 11-19 |
103 | Lecture19 | 2010/3/10~2010,03,10,,, | Risk psychology as a risk analysis | Other | Single-Author | ||
104 | Papers1 | 2010/3~2010,03,00,,, | Being canvassed for commodities futrures contracts and "trust" in the salespersons: Case studies of the victims | In-house publication | Single-Author | Kansai University Psychological Research | No. 1: 25-40 |
105 | Papers1 | 2009/12/25~2009,12,25,,, | Information transmission behavior of citizens after the risk messages were presented | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis | Vol. 19, No. 4: 11-19 |
106 | International academic conference8 | 2009/12/12~2009,12,12,,, | The infuluence of community entitativity on political trust | Other | Co-authored | ||
107 | International academic conference8 | 2009/12/9~2009,12,09,,, | Cross cultural/dietary study on risk/benefit perception of main food products between Japan and Western Countries. | Other | Co-authored | ||
108 | Papers1 | 2009/12~2009,12,00,,, | Media coverage of science and its relevance for the relationship to politics | Monograph | International coauthorship | Hans Peter Peters (ed.), "Media orientation of biomedical researchers in international comparison: The interface of Science & journalism and their political Relevance", Forschungszentrums Jülich | 9-43 |
109 | Papers1 | 2009/12~2009,12,00,,, | Biomedical researchers' contacts with journalists and the public: an international comparison of experiences and attitudes in Germany, France, Great Britain, Japan and the USA | Monograph | International coauthorship | Hans Peter Peters (ed.), "Media orientation of biomedical researchers in international comparison: The interface of Science & journalism and their political Relevance", Forschungszentrums Jülich | 45-99 |
110 | Academic presentation7 | 2009/10/10~2009,10,10,,, | Victems of commodities futrures contracts and risk perception | Other | Single-Author | ||
111 | Papers1 | 2009/7/9~2009,07,09,,, | Which has more effects on risk perception and judgments, Affect or Reason?: Effects of appeals in risk communication | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis | Vol. 19, No. 2: 45-56 |
112 | Papers1 | 2009/7/9~2009,07,09,,, | The effects energy shortage information has on provider trust due to the primary attitude towards nuclear power: Experimental study on risk communication | Academic Journal | Co-authored | Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis | Vol. 19, No. 2: 57-68 |
113 | Chapter or Section5 | 2009/6~2009,06,00,,, | Attitude and behavior | Monograph | Single-Author | Japanese Society of Social Psychology (ed.) "Encyclopedia of social psychology", Maruzen | 84-85 |
114 | International academic conference8 | 2009/5/18~2009,05,18,,, | Characteristics of Risk Communication in Japan and Korea | Other | Single-Author | Asian Conference on Risk Assessment and Management 2009 | |
115 | Papers1 | 2009/3/31~2009,03,31,,, | A social psychological discussion on risk perception and judgments: Including application to consumer behaviors | In-house publication | Single-Author | Annual Report 2008, Institute of Economic and Political Studies, Kansai University | 129-138 |
116 | International academic conference8 | 2008/12/29~2008,12,29,,, | Risk perception of the Japanese: which has more effects on risk perception, affect or reason? | Other | Single-Author | ||
117 | Lecture19 | 2008/11/28~2008,11,28,,, | Risk researches in Japan: their globalization and locality (IN International Symposium "The Past and the Future of Risk Analysis") | Other | Single-Author | ||
118 | Lecture19 | 2008/11/21~2008,11,21,,, | What is the "reality" in researches of consumer behaviors? | Other | Single-Author | ||
119 | Keynote address20 | 2008/11/7~2008,11,07,,, | How do we think about risk? | Other | Single-Author | ||
120 | Papers1 | 2008/11/1~2008,11,01,,, | Science-Media Interface: It's Time to Reconsider | Academic Journal | International coauthorship | Science Communication | vol. 30, No. 2: 266-276 |
121 | International academic conference8 | 2008/7/24~2008,07,24,,, | Effects of anxiety and disposition to trust in others on attitudes and information exploring behaviors in risk communication | Other | Co-authored | ||
122 | Papers1 | 2008/7/11~2008,07,11,,, | Interactions with the Mass Media | Academic Journal | International coauthorship | Science | vol. 321: 204-205 |
123 | International academic conference8 | 2008/6/26~2008,06,26,,, | Cross-national differences in scientists' implicit models of public communication (IN symposium "Science and Media: A cross-national analysis of biomedical researchers' interactions with the media and the rol of organizational science PR.") | Other | Single-Author | ||
124 | Papers1 | 2008/3/31~2008,03,31,,, | Judgment of Public Acceptance of a Technology Accompanied by the Risk of Potential Disasters: Logic, emotion and value | Academic Journal | Co-author | Annual Report, Doshisha Research Center for Human Security | No.5: 35-50 |
125 | Lecture19 | 2008/3/6~2008,03,06,,, | The concept of risk in the psychological viewpoint (IN symposium "Risk governance in sustainability") | Other | Single-Author | ||
126 | Papers1 | 2008/3~2008,03,00,,, | Victems of commodities futrures contracts and their psychological processes | Academic Journal | Single-Author | Journal of Commodities Futrures Contracts Victems | No.30: 25-34 |
127 | Commentary9 | 2008/1/31~2008,01,31,,, | Risk related terms in psychology | Monograph | Single-Author | The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan (ed.), "Dictionary of risk terms", Maruzen | 311-312 |
128 | Lecture19 | 2008/1/21~2008,01,21,,, | How do we perceive and interpret risk?: Risk social psychology | Other | Single-Author |
PapersA Case Study of Disaster Risk Reduction in Schools for the Blind in ThailandIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authorWONGSURIYANAN, Chayanee;TSUCHIDA,ShojiDisaster Risk Reduction;Schools for the Blind;Self-Efficacy;Students With Visual Impairment;ThailandInternational Journal of Disaster Response and Emergency ManagementVol. 6, No. 1, Pp. 1-142023/6/9~IGI Globalhttp://doi.org/10.4018/IJDREM.324574In Thailand, 9% of people with disabilities are visually impaired (VI). VI children are vulnerable when disasters occur. This study investigates risk situations and disaster risk reduction (DRR) methods in VI schools to identify present and potential ways that students can be provided skills. An interview was administered in two schools to schoolteachers and administrators. Content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data based on core keywords. DRR for daily risk exposure and fires is the priority. Concerns over VI students are based on the difficulty in orientation. Support is considered crucial for student safety. Supervisory means to limit risk among the VI is uncertain in times of disaster. Students are capable of learning about DRR and, combined with assistive techniques, can limit their risk. DRR policies in VI schools are primarily reactive. Uncomplicated risk awareness information and training could foster an appropriate approach to bringing self-efficacy to deal with risk.
International academic conferenceA case study of disaster risk analysis in Schools for blind in ThailandWONGSURIYANAN, Chayanee;TSUCHIDA,Shoji2022/12/5~The Society for Risk AnalysisAnnual Meeting 2022
International academic conferenceThe Japanese response to COVID -19 pandemic and its vaccinationSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA,ShojiCOVID-19;risk perception;Japanese response;online surveys2022/11/18~The Asian Regional Organization of the Society for Risk AnalysisSRA Asia Conference 2022 (Seoul & online) [Keynote Speech]From the end of 2019 the world has been suffered from COVID-19 pandemic. In Japan we had 7 waves of the infection spread so far. We conducted 6 time-series-surveys nationwide [Aug. 2020 (N=6,000); Dec. 2020 (N=2, 000); Feb. 2021 (N=1,500); Jun. 2021 (N=2,500); Oct. 2021 (N=1,500); May-Jun. 2022 (N=1,500)] to investigate the Japanese response to the pandemic and the vaccination. Before the vaccination started major measures against the pandemic were that from public health, including restriction on interpersonal contacts that brought psychological stress to people. And the stress drove people to do infection avoidance behaviors. The vaccination started on February 2021 in Japan. On Dec. 2020 47.7% of people wanted to receive vaccination. Now about 80% received it at least twice. However, about 8% of people have refused vaccination whose risk perception to the vaccine was extremely negative. And by May-Jun. 2022 survey we found that among people with low income and low education the ratio of people who refuse the vaccination was relatively high.
CommentaryWhat is RISK COMMUNICATION in the field of atomic energy use?In refereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA,ShojiJournal of the Atomic Energy Society of JapanVol.64, No.11, 644-645.2022/11/1~the Atomic Energy Society of Japanhttps://doi.org/10.3327/jaesjb.64.11_6441882-2606
PapersMonographCo-authoredSHIZUMA, Taketo;TSUCHIDA, Shoji2022/9/30~
PapersChanges in response of the Japanese to COVID-19 and its vaccine till October 2021In refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Shizuma, T;Urayama, K.COVID-19;Vaccination;Time-series questionnaire surveys;New life -stylesJapanese Journal of Risk Analysis32(1), 43-562022/9/26~ https://doi.org/10.11447/jjra.SRA-0403Response of the Japanese to COVID-19 and its vaccine was investigated with time-series questionnaire surveys conducted on December 2020 [N=2,500], February 2021 [N=1,500], June 2021 [N=2,500], and October 2021 [N=1,500]. The results showed that on December 2020 less than half of the respondents wanted to receive COVID-19 vaccination and about one fifth of them refused it. High anxiety led intension of the vaccination. On October 2021 three fourth of people in Japan had received the vaccination, and the most of respondents perceived COVID-19 vaccine very safe and beneficial. However, about 10% of respondents seemed to stick refusing the vaccination through all the surveys, and COVID-19 brought diversity of life-styles. Suitable and sufficient risk communication would be needed.
PapersChanges in people’s minds about COVID-19: Focus on the risk perception of VaccinationIn refereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredURAYAMA, Kaoru;TSUCHIDA, ShojiCOVID-19;Free Description Data;Risk Perception;VaccinationJournal of Societal Safety SciencesVol. 12, 47-592022/3/31~Research Center for Societal Safety SciencesIn Japan, we have experienced the five-wave of COVID-19. In June and October 2021,
we conducted two online questionnaire surveys on attitude/perception change from the
first wave to the fifth wave, and risk perception of the COVID-19 vaccination. The
results showed that the degree of attitude change gradually decreased from the first
wave. Furthermore, those who intend to vaccinate were a lower risk perception of
vaccination than those who do not.
PapersReturn migration after Disasters: A Case study of 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant AccidentUnrefereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredNAGAMATSU, Shingo;KOSHIYAMA, Kenji;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;NAGATA, Shozo;SUGA, Mashiho;KAWATA, Yoshiaki;SEKIYA, Naoya;HIROI, UReturn migration;disaster recovery;nuclear disaster;radiationJournal of Societal Safety ScienceVol. 12, 73-812022/3/31~Research Center for Societal Safety SciencesWe investigate what are the factors that influence people’s intent to return after disasters by a literature
survey and conduct an empirical analysis on return migration by using a unique survey of Fukushima
evacuees to determine the factors that influence their decision to return after a disaster. We also conduct
the simulation of the number of evacuees who intend to return. The result found that the number of
returnees encouraged by this decontamination was 12,882, less than 8% of the total evacuees, while the
decontamination cost per returnee was 3.36 million USD.
International academic conferenceEthical and societal considerations associated with future generations in the application of the concepts of tolerability and reasonablenessOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA,Shojiradiation protection;future generations;tolerability;reasonableness2022/3/23~International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP): Task Group 114online
PapersPeople’s response to Covid-19 vaccinationMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiCOVID-19;vaccination;people's response;questionnaire social surveysFaculty of Societal Safety Sciences, Kansai University (ed.), “Investigation: COVID-19 disaster”, Minerva-Shobo230-2472022/2/20~978-4-623-09341-0
PapersResponse of the Japanese to COVID-19 till August 2020In refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTSUCHIDA,Shoji;MOTOYOSHI, Tadahiro;KONDO, Seiji;SHIZAMA, Taketo;URAYAMA, Kaoru;OMURA, KayoCOVID-19;Anxiety;New Normal Life Styles;People Flow;Social Networking Service (SNS)Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis31 (2), 79-882021/12/25~The Society for Risk Analysis Japanhttps://doi.org/10.11447/jjra.SRA-0360Response of the Japanese to Covid-19 was investigated with 2 online questionnaire surveys conducted on May 2020 [N=1,200] and on August 2020 [N=6,000]. The results showed that high anxiety led sense of discrimination and adopting prevention behaviors against infection. People in metropolitan areas seemed estimating infection risk of long rage transport lower than people in rural areas. And response to Covid-19 of the Japanese residing outside of Japan was investigated with an online survey on August 2020 [N=116]. The results showed that in many countries the respondents answered that their local governments’ policies against Covid-19 were better than the Japanese policy because of swiftness, leadership, public relations, ICT use, and so on.
PapersHow and what did the Japanese people react to Covid-19 pandemic on August 2020?MonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiCovid-19;Risk Perception;Psychological Stress;Online Questionnaire Survey;JapanKansai Univ.(ed.), Covid-19 pandemic drived the public into mayhem, so Kansai Univ. tried to consider on it, Naniwa-sha88-1012021/4~978-4-88854-535-8
PapersSummary Report on Actual Situation of Overseas Japanese under COVID-19 CrisisIn refereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredKONDO, Seiji;TSUCHIDA,ShojiCOVID-19;Overseas Japanese;Psychological Stress;Social Support;New NormalJournal of Societal Safety Sciencesvol. 11, 125-1362021/3~Societal Safety Science Research Center (Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University)http://doi.org/10.32286/00023052Although COVID-19 has caused various social confusion across the world, no surveys are found which target the Japanese living overseas under this crisis. This study conducted an online questionnaire survey. The respondents were 116 Kansai University graduates who were stationed abroad. In conclusion, 65.2% of respondents evaluated Japanese government’s measures were less effective than that of the country where they resided. 19.0% of respondents felt discriminated because of their nationality. Almost all respondents were under a lot of psychological stress. Mutual aids among local residents were activated in many countries.
PapersRisk perception and attitude formation of Covid-19 vaccine in December 2020: Online questionnaire survey with 2,500 respondentsIn refereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredTSUCHIDA,Shoji;SHIZUMA, Taketo;URAYAMA, KaoruCovid-19;Vaccine;Risk Perception;Risk Communication;Online Questionnaire Survey;JapanJournal of Societal Safety Sciencesvol. 11, 137-1502021/3~Societal Safety Science Research Center (Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University)http://doi.org/10.32286/00023053Covid-19 vaccine is expected as the measure to overcome the pandemic. It is said that at least 70% of people should receive vaccination to achieve herd immunity. We conducted an online questionnaire survey on risk perception and attitude formation of Covid-19 vaccine with total of 2,500 respondents in 5 areas of Japan, Hokkaido, Tohoku, Tokyo, Osaka, and Chugoku-Shikoku from 11 to 15 December, 2020. The results showed that about half of respondents would accept inoculation with the vaccine. Only about 30% perceived that the vaccine would have good effects as medicine, and about 30% were afraid that it would have any side-effects. We put the same questions about Covid-19 vaccine before and after questions about HPV vaccine and influenza vaccine and the answers were very stable. It seemed that people’s attitudes to Covid-19 vaccine had already formed. The female and people in their 30s and 40s had rela-tively less positive perception of Covid-19 vaccine. Risk communication with correct information of the vaccine should be needed to achieve the herd immunity with it.
International academic conferenceChinese Panic Behaviors in EarthquakesOtherInternational coauthorshipTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Zhai, Guofang;URAYAMA, Kaoru;SHIZUMA, Taketo;KUBO, Minoru;OMURA, Kayorisk perception;panic behaviors;disatsters;China;questionnaire survey2020/12/14~The Scociety for Risk AnalysisThe Scociety for Risk Analysis, Annual Meeting 2020 [online]
PapersTransition of the Concept of Vulnerable People at Disaster and Proposal of the Capability approach for the Vulnerable PeopleIn refereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredSHIZUMA, Taketo;TSUCHIDA,Shoji;KANOSHIMA, Emiko;SUGA, Mashihovulnerable people at disaster;supporters as vulnerable people;capability approachJournal of Societal Safety Sciencesvol. 10, 3-132020/3~Societal Safety Science Research Center (Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University)In Japan, the concept of the vulnerable people at disaster such as elderly people and people with disabilities has been discussed. At the time of disaster, people who live in the community are expected to provide support for the vulnerable people who live there. However, there is a shortage of supporters to support the vulneravule people and an increase in the burden of supporters. In other words, there are limits to how to support vulnerable people. Therefore, in this study, we organized what perspectives the concept of the vulnerable people was discussed. In addition, we considered the assistance countermeasure for the vulnerable people based on capability approach. As a result, we concluded that not only the vulnerable people who have been conventionally discussed, but their supporters also need help at disasters. In addition, considering the relationship between the vulnerable people and the supporters, we pointed out the importance of sharing the information that the needs of the vulnerable people and the resources of the supporters among the stakeholders.
International academic conferenceSafety and Risk in Social Psychological PerspectiveOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojisafety;security;risk;social psychology;radiological protection2020/1/12~International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group (TG) 114International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group (TG) 114 – 2nd meeting [Lisbon, Portugal]
Keynote addressHuman Behaviors in Emergency: Panic in disasters in ChinaOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojipanic behaviors;disatsters;risk perception;China2019/10/17~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, ChinaThe 7th International Conference on Risk Analysis and Crisis Response [Athens, Greece]
International academic conferenceCrisis Communication at Fukushima NPP Accident in 2011OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojicrisis communication;Fukushima;NPP Accident2019/9/13~Kansai UniversityInternational Symposium on Strategy of Disaster Risk Management for Sustainable Growth [Takatsuki, Japan]
International academic conferencePanic behaviors in disasters in ChinaOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojipanic behaviors;disatsters;risk perception;China2019/7/29~Decision ResearchWorkshop on Compassion Research and Pro-social Decision Making [Eugine, USA]
Chapter or SectionRisk CcommunicationMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiRisk Communication208-2112019/6~978-4-621-30381-8
Chapter or SectionRisk Perception and HeuristicsMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiRisk Perception;Heuristics216-2192019/6~978-4-621-30381-8
PapersContemporary Societies and RiskMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, Shoji;KONDO, Seiji;KOSHIYAMA, KenjiSocietal Safety Sciences;Risk Perception;Contemporary SocietiesAbe, S., Ozawa, M., Kawata, Y.(eds.), Science of Societal Safety: Living at time of risks and disasters, Springer27-362019~https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2775-9_3
International academic conferencePeople of Fukushima after NPP DisasterOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiPopulation Migration;Fukushima;risk perception2018/11/15~Japan Foundation, Kansai Univeristy, University of Southern CaliforniaSymposium on Population Migration and Repatriation Following Major Disasters [Los Angeles, USA]
Edited bookPsychology of safety and risk: Safety created by mindMonographEditorTSUCHIDA,ShojiANZEN;risk;psychology2018/9~978-4-563-05886-9
International academic conferenceGod's Altruism: Cultural difference of responsibility for safetyOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiCultural difference;responsibility for safety2018/7/30~Decision ResearchWorkshop on Compassion Research and Pro-social Decision Making [Eugine, USA]
International academic conferenceMass Panic phenomena at Disasters in China in comparison to Japan and the USOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiMass Panic;disasters;China;Japan;US2018/7/18~Iwate University, Tsinghua University, Harverd UniversityThe Global Conference on the International Network of Disaster Studies in Iwate, Japan “Iwate Conference” [Morioka, Japan]
Keynote addressPsychology and Risk AnalysisOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojipsychology;risk analysis2018/3/14~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, Japan, China, KoreaThe Society for Risk Analysis, Asia Conference 2018 [Takatsuki, Japan]
International academic conferenceThe effect of metacognition on help-seeking intentions by the scene imagination method: Preliminary survey in high school studentsOtherCo-authoredSHIZUMA, Taketo;TSUCHIDA, Shojimetacognition;help-seeking intentions;scene imagination method2018/3/13~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, Japan, China, KoreaThe Society for Risk Analysis, Asia Conference 2018 [Takatsuki, Japan]
International academic conferenceA study on Disaster related death associated with the Great East Earthquake in Fukushima PrefectureOtherCo-authoredKUBO, Minoru;TSUCHIDA, ShojiDisaster related death;Great East Earthquake;Fukushima2018/3/13~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, Japan, China, KoreaThe Society for Risk Analysis, Asia Conference 2018 [Takatsuki, Japan]
International academic conferenceAttitude of Japanese Citizens toward Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: Risk Perception and TrustOtherCo-authoredURAYAMA, Kaoru;TSUCHIDA, ShojiDecommissioning;Fukushima;trust;risk perception;risk communication2018/3/13~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, Japan, China, KoreaThe Society for Risk Analysis, Asia Conference 2018 [Takatsuki, Japan]
International academic conferenceCollective Behaviors in WarOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojicollective behaviors;Korean peninsula;military tension;risk analysis2018/3/13~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, Japan, China, KoreaThe Society for Risk Analysis, Asia Conference 2018 [Takatsuki, Japan]
International academic conferenceRisk communication at disasterOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk communication;disasters2017/12/26~The Scociety for Risk Analysis, ChinaInternational Symposium on Urban Disaster Mitigation [Taizhou, China]
PapersA study on Disaster-related deaths associated with the Great East Japan Earthquake in Fukushima Prefecture.In refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredKUBO, Minoru;TSUCHIDA,Shoji;SHIZUMA, Taketothe Great East Japan Earthquake;Fukushina accident;Disaster-related death;Stigma;Risk communication;Care communicationJournal of the Atomic Energy Society of JapanVol. 59, No. 12, 727-7312017/12/1~Atomic Energy Society of Japanhttps://doi.org/10.3327/jaesjb.59.12_727
PapersThe Government and TEPCO Problems in Communicationg Information with the Public during the Fukushima-1 NPP Accident.MonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiFukushima 1 NPP accident;Crisis communicationaculty of Societal Safety Sciences(ed.), THE FUKUSHIMA AND TOHOKU DISASTER, Elsevier / Butterworth-Heinemannpp.287-3082017/12~978-0128140789
International academic conferenceLearning from the Risk Communications at Fukushima-Daiichi NPP AccidentOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiFukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident;risk communication2017/5/12~Sichuan University2017 Banaqia Symposium on Disaster Jurisprudence [Banaqia, China]
International academic conferenceRisk Communications at Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Station AccidentOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiFukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident;risk communication2017/3/16~Universiti Utara Malaysia / Kansai UniversityUUM/KU Joint Research seminar on Disaster [Sintok, Malaysia]
International academic conferenceInvestgating Risk Communications by Japanese government at Fukushima-Daiichi NPP AccidentOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiFukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident;risk communication;Japanese government2017/1/10~Harvard Kennedy School, Tsinghua University, China Institute for Reform and DevelopmentFrom the Management of Crisis to the Governance of Risk [Haikou, China]
International academic conferenceInvestgating Risk Communication at Fukushima-Daiichi NPP AccidentOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiFukushima-Daiichi NPP Accident;risk communication2016/12/12~The Society for Risk AnalysisThe Society for Risk Analysis, Annual Meeting 2016 [San Deigo]
PapersSocial Capital, Mutual Aids in Disasters, and Evaluation on Neighborhood’s Disaster-Preparation: Comparison between the States of Volunteer-Firefighter and the States of Career-Firefighter in the United StatesIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTSUCHIDA,Shoji;SHIOTANI, Takamasa;TSUJIKAWA, Norifumi;NAKAGAWA, Yurisocial capital;questionnaire survey;mutual aids in disasters;disaster-preparation;efficacy against disastersSafety Science ReviewNo. 62016/3/31~Societal Safety Science Research Center (Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University)Putnam defined concept of social capital as social network and also focused on its psychological aspects of trust, good will, fellowship, and sympathy. Influence of subjective connectedness in neighborhood, a psychological feature of social capital, on evaluation on neighborhood’s disaster-preparation was compared between 14 States in the U.S where more than 80% of fire departments were served by all volunteer-firefighters (SVF) [Nebraska, South Dakota, Pennsylvania, New York, etc.] and 6 States where more than 20 % of fire department were with all Career-firefighters (SCF) [Florida, Massachusetts, California, Arizona, etc.]. It was assumed that culture or social norm of neighbors’ mutual aids in disasters is kept in SVF while it is at a low ebb in SCF. Respondents of a nationwide online questionnaire survey in SVF [N=180] and in SCF [N=170] were put into causality analyses of SEM. The results showed that perception of social capital determined evaluation on neighborhood’s disaster-preparation in SVF but it directly determined personal disaster-preparing behaviors in SCF. It might be considered that it was spurious relationship and true cause of it was small size of communities, as almost all the areas with small population are protected by volunteer-firefighters in the U.S. However, the spurious relationship was not supported by the analysis with respondents in urban life style areas [N=379] and in country life style areas [N=235]. It was interpreted that culture or social norm of neighbors’ mutual aids in disasters was a factor whether perception of social capital facilitate evaluation on neighborhood’s disaster-preparation.
PapersRisk communication after Fukushima-Daiichi NPP accidentUnrefereedMonographSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA,ShojiFukushima-Daiichi NPP accident;risk communication;responses by Japanese government;crisis communication;care communication;consensus communicationMinerva-Shobo308-3322016/3/31~Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), Investigating 5-year-recovery after the Great East Japan Disaster in 2011The risk communications by the Japanese government to respond Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident in2011 and after were investigated. In the investigation risk communications were divided into crisis communications, care communications, and consensus communications, and the first two were mainly discussed.
PapersMigration intentions and their determinants: Comparison of college students in China and JapanIn refereedAcademic JournalInternational coauthorshipHe, Zhongyu;Zhai, Guofang;Asami, Yasushi;TSUCHIDA, Shojimigration intentions;college-to-work migration;college students;China;Japan;region tierAsian and Pacific Migration Journal25(1): 62-842016/3~Sagehttps://doi.org/10.1177/011719681562120301171968Maintaining a young, well-educated labor force is an important strategy for regional economic development and social vitality. Based on a comparative study of China and Japan, this article aims to elicit 1) the factors that affect college students’ employment migration preference; and 2) the differences between migration preferences of students from the two countries and the possible explanations for such differences. With the use of survey data from approximately 2,000 college students in the two countries, this study identifies region of origin as a key determinant of employment migration choice in both countries. The region of origin functions as a critical point differentiating primary and secondary labor markets for individuals, whereas the first-tier region in each country is a popular work destination. A one-way bottom-up migration from lower-ranking to higher-ranking regions is revealed in our regional hierarchy model. Findings suggest that Chinese students were oriented to employment opportunities and economic well-being while Japanese students were more inclined to consider personal lifestyle and local amenities. The findings imply that reducing regional disparities in economic development and income levels in China and enhancing urban service facilities in Japan may encourage college graduates to remain in their home regions.
PapersRisk communication and social psychologyMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiK. Kondo (ed.) “Legal engineering for practical use of new technologies: Law to respond risks and to secure safety”, Minjiho-Kenkyukaipp. 135-1562016/2/12~978-4-86556-066-4
PapersChanges in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear DisasterIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTSUJIKAWA, Norifumi;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;SHIOTANI, TakamasaRisk AnalysisVolume 36, Issue 1, Pages 98-1132016/1~The Society for Risk Analysis (Wiley)https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12447Public support for nuclear power generation has decreased in Japan since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in March 2011. This study examines how the factors influencing public acceptance of nuclear power changed after this event. The influence factors examined are perceived benefit, perceived risk, trust in the managing bodies, and pro-environmental orientation (i.e., new ecological paradigm). This study is based on cross-sectional data collected from two online nationwide surveys: one conducted in November 2009, before the nuclear accident, and the other in October 2011, after the accident. This study's target respondents were residents of Aomori, Miyagi, and Fukushima prefectures in the Tohoku region of Japan, as these areas were the epicenters of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the locations of nuclear power stations. After the accident, trust in the managing bodies was found to have a stronger influence on perceived risk, and pro-environmental orientation was found to have a stronger influence on trust in the managing bodies; however, perceived benefit had a weaker positive influence on public acceptance. We also discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
Open classWhat is Risk Communication?OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk communication;risk perception;nulear energy2015/12/15~Urban Planning Society of China; China Association of Disaster Prevention;
Nanjing UniversitySeminar for International Nuclear Business in FY 2015[Tsuruga]
International academic conferenceIs important the expected information than the detailed information:The confirmation bias as a determinant of satisfaction for risk communication.OtherCo-authoredSHIOTANI, Takamasa;TSUCHIDA, Shojiconfirmation bias;expected information;detailed information;risk communication2015/9/23~The Asian Association of Social PsychologyThe 11th Biennial Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology [Cebu City]
Open classCitizens' risk perception toward nuclear energyOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojinulear energy;risk perception;risk communication2015/6/9~JN-HRD.net, JAEA, Univ. of Tokyo, JAIF, JICC, IAEAJapan-IAEA Joint Nuclear Energy Management School 2015[Tokai-mura]
Open classSocial Capital, Mutual Aids in Disasters, and Evaluation on Neighborhood’s Disaster-Preparation: Comparison between the States of Volunteer-Firefighter and the States of Career-Firefighter in the United States.OtherCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;SHIOTANI, Takamasa;TSUJIKAWA, Norifumisocial capital;mutual aids in disasters;volunteer;firefighters;US2014/12/9~The Society for Risk AnalysisThe Society for Risk Analysis, Annual Meeting 2014 [Denver]
PapersPeriodical public opinion survey on nuclear energy (Inhabitants living in the Tokyo metropolitan area)In refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredSHINODA, Yoshihiko;TSUCHIDA,Shoji;KIMURA, Hiroshinuclear energy;survey of public opinion;trends in public attitude;Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accidentTransactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japanvol. 13, No. 3, 94-1122014/9~Atomic Energy Society of Japan10.3327/taesj.j13.018Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident (Fukushima accident) has brought about a great change in many people's perceptions about nuclear power plant safety. When discussing future energy options for Japn, it is important to have a full grasp of the attitude of a large number of people towards nuclear energy. The Atomic Energy Society of Japan has conducted annual questionnaire survey of 500 adults who live within 30 kilometers of Tokyo Station. The aim of this survey is to assess trends in public attitude towards nuclear energy. The authors that designed the questionnaire entries of this survey have been managing questionnaire data as members of the Data Management Workin Group under the Social and Environmental Division of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan. We confirmed the change in public attitude towards nuclear energy through this periodical survey after the Fukushima accident. In particular, public concerns about the use of nuclear energy increased after the Fukushima accident, and meny people have raised doubts over the use of nuclear energy in the future.
International academic conferenceEffects of risk judgment tendency on the language representation of risk at The Tohoku Disaster: A comparison between Japanese and AmericanOtherCo-authoredNakagawa,Yuri;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;TSUJIKAWA, Norifumi;SHIOTANI, TakamasaTohoku disaster;judgment;language representation;Japan;US2014/7/13~International Association of Applied Psychology8th International Conference on Applied Psychology [Paris]
PapersComparative research on NIMBY risk acceptability between Chinese and Japanese college studentsIn refereedAcademic JournalInternational coauthorshipWU, Yunqing;Zhai, Guofang;LI, Shasha;REN, Chongqiang;TSUCHIDA, ShojiNIMBY facility;risk acceptability;structural equation model;Chinese and Japanese college studentsEnvironmental Monitoring and AssessmentVol. 186, No. 10: 6683-66942014/7/9~Springerhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3882-7Along with the progressive acceleration of urbanization, the need to identify potentially troublesome "Not My Back Yard" (NIMBY) facilities in the city is inevitable. To resolve NIMBY conflict, it is important to know people’s NIMBY risk acceptability for these facilities. A questionnaire survey was used among Chinese and Japanese college students to identify NIMBY risk acceptability. LISREL was used to construct a structural equation model to analyze the difference in NIMBY risk acceptability between the Chinese and Japanese college students. Factors that may affect NIMBY risk acceptability were analyzed: "perceiving utility,""perceiving risk,""trust in government,""reasonable compensation," and "procedural justice." The findings show that Japanese students' concerns were greater than Chinese students' concerns. Perceiving utility and perceiving risk were the most important factors that affect people's NIMBY risk acceptability, followed by procedural justice, trust in government, and reasonable compensation. There is a difference between the different cultural backgrounds in confronting the risk: Chinese students focus more on the reputation and value of real estate, while Japanese students pay more attention to environmental pollution and damage to health. Furthermore, cultural influences play a role in students' risk perception. To improve the risk acceptability for NIMBY facilities and provide a basis for resolving NIMBY conflicts, it is necessary to ensure the benefits of the NIMBY facility while reducing environmental pollution. The findings of this study may be of interest for policy makers and practitioners to devise future NIMBY strategies.
PapersA communication method beyond the gap between citizens and experts (1): Psychological barrier between them shown by social surveysIn refereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiJournal of the Atomic Energy Society of JapanVol. 56, No. 4, 245-2492014/4~Atomic Energy Society of Japanhttps://doi.org/10.3327/taesj.J13.018
CommentaryDo we need robots with "KOKORO (ego / mind)"?OtherCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, Shoji2014/4~New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
PapersRisk perception and behaviors of the Japanese after the North-East Japan Disaster 2011MonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, ShojiFaculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Safety Science for Prevention and Mitigation against Natural Disasters", Minerva-Shobo.65-802014/3/15~978-4-623-06943-9
PapersUnrefereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredTSUJIKAWA, Norifumi;TSUCHIDA,ShojiNo.47, 21-342014/3~Kobe Shinwa Women's University
Chapter or SectionAttitudeMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA,ShojiAttitudeThe Japanses Society for Cognitive Psycholoy (ed.) Handbook of cognitive psychology, Yuhikaku308-3092013/12~978-4-641-18416-9
PapersThe relation among intragroup relational cognition, collective efficacy, and the civic intention of participation and acceptance in the community: A questionnaire study in NaraIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredShiotani,T.;Nakahara, K.;TSUCHIDA, Shojicummunity;intragroup relationship;collective efficacy;participationg and acceptance intentinJapanese Journal of Social Psychologyvol. 29, No. 2, 113-1192013/11~The Japanese Society of Social Psychologyhttps://doi.org/10.14966/jssp.KJ00008993921Previous studies have shown the positive effects of collective efficacy on community collective actions. As a predictor of collective efficacy, while behavioral social connectedness has shown a positive effect in some studies, the effect of cognitive social connectedness is little known. In this study, the perceived intragroup relationship (Yuki, 2003) was applied in order to investigate the relation among perceived intragroup relationship, collective efficacy, and the intention of participating in community development. We distributed questionnaires to 500 citizens and analyzed data that were collected from 121 respondents. The result of correlation analysis showed a positive relation among the intention of participating, collective efficacy, intragroup relational cognition, and behavioral social connectedness. Furthermore, a determinate process model of the intention to participate was examined using path analysis. The results indicate that perceived intragroup relationship has a positive correlation with social connectedness behavior and a positive effect on collective efficacy, but social connectedness behavior does not have a significant effect on collective efficacy.
Open classJapanese Citizens’ Risk Perception toward Nuclear PowerOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;nuclear energy;Japanese citizens2013/5/31~The Joint Japan - IAEA Nuclear Energy Management School (IN Session "Nulcear power: Advancing technology and social consent)The University of TokyoJapanese citizens’ risk perception and acceptance of nuclear power have dramatically changed to negative since the TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident in 2011. However, at the general election of the lower house in December 2012, LDP which had declared the policy to promote nuclear power use won to become the governing party.
At the Lecture the trends of Japanese citizens’ risk perception and acceptance of nuclear power shown on the results of social surveys will be presented. And the psychological processes of them will be discussed
Open classJapanese citizens’ risk perception toward nuclear powerOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojinulear power;risk perception;the Japanese2013/5/31~International Atomic Energy AgencyThe Joint Japan–IAEA Nuclear Energy Management School [Tokyo]
PapersWhat the public want in nuclear useUnrefereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiJournal of the Hear Transfer Society of JapanVol. 52, No. 219: 61-672013/4~The Heat Transfer Society of Japan
Research reportStudies for Crossing over from Community of Nuclear Experts; (1) Concept of StudiesOtherCo-authoredKIMURA, H.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;KANZAKI, N.;MOROKUZU, M.;SHINODA, Y.;BEPPU, Y.;KUBO, M.NPP Fukushima-1 accident;Community concerning Nuclear Technology;Perception Gap between public and experts;Field for Communication2013/3/26~Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Spring meeting 2013
Research reportStudies for Crossing over from Community of Nuclear Experts; (2) Outline of the social surveys and their resultsOtherCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;KIMURA, H.;KANZAKI, N.;MOROKUZU, M.;SHINODA, Y.;BEPPU, Y.;KUBO, M.NPP Fukushima-1 accident;Community concerning Nuclear Technology;Perception Gap between public and experts;Social surveys toward citizens and experts2013/3/26~Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Spring meeting 2013
Research reportStudies for Crossing over from Community of Nuclear Experts; (3) Design for "forum"OtherCo-authoredKANZAKI, N.;KIMURA, H.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;MOROKUZU, M.;SHINODA, Y.;BEPPU, Y.;KUBO, M.NPP Fukushima-1 accident;Community concerning Nuclear Technology;Field for Communication2013/3/26~Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Spring meeting 2013
PapersSocial psychology of accidentsMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, ShojiFaculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Safety Science for Accident Prevention and Mitigation", Minerva-Shobo182-1982013/3/25~
PapersComparing disaster perception in Japan and the USUnrefereedOtherCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Shiotani, T.;Nakagawa, Y.S. Ikeda & Y. Maeda (eds.) "Emerging Issues Learned from the 3.11 Disaster as Multiple Events of Earthquake, Tsunami and Fukushima Nuclear Accident", The Society for Risk Analysis, JapanPp. 59-612013/3/11~
PapersRisk Literacy and Risk Perception among Undergraduates in China: Case of BSEIn refereedAcademic JournalInternational coauthorshipMa, H;Zhai, Guofang;TSUCHIDA, Shojirisk literacy;risk perception;undergraduates;China;BSE;American beefHuman and Ecological Risk Assessmentvol. 19, No. 2: 526-5372013/3~10.1080/10807039.2013.7551011080-7039Risk response and cognitive characteristics of different groups are important aspects in risk research. In this article we discuss the general features of risk literacy and perception among undergraduates at Nanjing University and Huaiyin Institute of Technology in China in the case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The results show that: (1) there seem to be no relationships between respondents’ knowledge about BSE and their risk identification; (2) between all contrast samples, the greatest divergence appears in the judgment about probability of risk while the smallest one is the trust in science and technology to avoid BSE; (3) the judgment of hazard probability would be related to gender, family location, and the backgrounds of college and academic specialty. And only gender has impact on the affirmation of hazard with a significant level of 0.05. These findings provide insights into the comprehension of undergraduates’ risk literacy and perception, and can contribute to the improvement of risk communication and management in China.
PapersCrisis communication at NPP-Fukushima1 accidentUnrefereedAcademic JournalCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, ShojiNPP Fukushima-1 accident;crisis communication;myth of panic;elite panicThe Thermal and Nuclear PowerNo. 675(Vol. 63, No. 12): 38-432012/12~The crisis communication at the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in the disaster 3.11 was examined. I discussed the nature of crisis communication which is information exchange between the persons responsible to the accident and the public. And Myth of Panic and Elite Panic were also discussed.
Academic presentationCohesiveness of communityOtherCo-authoredShiotani, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Nakagawa, Y.;Tsujikawa, N.Cohesiveness;community2012/11/18~53rd Annual Conference of Japanese Society of Social Psychology
Academic presentationEffects of risk estimation tendency on risk perception at The Tohoku DisasterOtherCo-authoredNakagawa, Y.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Shiotani, T.Risk perception;trade-off;zero-risk;the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;content analysis2012/11/11~25th Annual Conference of Society for Risk Analysis, JapanAt the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011, we had lots of risk events such as earthquake, tsunami, nuclear power plant accident, and debris removal. Citizens as well as experts have faced to correct judgment on these risks. We conducted Online survey of risk perception with 2,500 respondents liveing in Tohoku, Tokyo, Osaka, and Kyushu in November 2011. The respondents' free descriptions about "the most impressive event at the disaster" were taken into correspondence analysis of quantitative data.
Keynote addressOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiaffect heuristic;crisis communication;NPP Fukushima-1 accident2012/11/10~25th Annual Conference of Society for Risk Analysis, Japan
LectureResearches in SRA-JapanOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiresearches in risks;statistics of articles;statistics of oral presentations;SRA Japan2012/11/10~25th Annual Conference of Society for Risk Analysis, Japan
Academic presentationChanges in attitude structure toward nuclear power in the nuclear power plant locations of Tohoku districtOtherCo-authoredTsujikawa, N.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Shiotani, T.;Nakagawa, Y.Trust;Nuclear power;Environmental value;Risk perception2012/11/10~25th Annual Conference of Society for Risk Analysis, JapanThis survey was examined the changes in structure of attitude toward nuclear power and the influence of environmental value on the attitude structure before and after the accident at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. With residents of Aomori, Miyagi, and Fukushima prefectures as participants, we conducted online surveys in November 2009 and October 2011. Comparing the results before and after the accident, we found that trust in the management of nuclear power plants had a stronger influence on the perceived risk and benefit regarding nuclear power after the accident than before the accident. The value of concern about environmental destruction resulted in reduced trust in the management.Nuclear Safety Research Association 20030401-20050331
PapersDeperminants of trust in goverment with regard to nuclear power: The role of political collective efficacy and perception of civic social relationshipsIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredShiotani, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.trust in government;political collective efficacy;perceived ingroup enetitativity;nuclear power;risk communicationThe Japanese Journal of Applied PsychologyVol. 28, No. 2: 99-1052012/11~It is necessary for stakeholders to build trust in risk communication. However, misplaced trust may lead to negative incidents. The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between the trust in government with regard to nuclear power, political collective efficacy (PCE) and civic social relationship (which was measured as perceived ingroup entitativity). Data used for this study were collected through a nationwide Internet social survey on energy and nuclear energy. Data collected from 2,503 participants were classified and compared on the basis of conditions around residential areas, such as nuclear power plant sitings, and type of area (conurbation or provincial areas), and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Good fit indexes were shown for each residential area, and it was found that PCE affected the trust in government whereas perceived ingroup entitativity did not. Furthermore, significant differences were found between the correlation coefficients of PCE and perceived ingroup entitativity.Awarded by The Japan Association of Applied Psychology in 2013
PapersProduction and application of consumer researchUnrefereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredMoriguchi, T.;Ueda, T.;Ehara, A.;Onzo, N.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiconsumer studies;reviewAdvancers in Consumer StudiesVol. 19, No. 1, 77-892012/10/31~
Keynote addressThe disster 3.11 in Japan: Resilience in Tohoku compared with the USOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojithe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;community;psychological resilience2012/10/28~Society for Risk Analysis, China, The 5th Annual Meeting [Nanjing]
Research reportOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojinuclear power;citizens' perception;experts' perception;risk perception;questionnaire survey;replicated survey;NPP Fukushima-1 accident2012/9/20~Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Autumn meeting 2012
LectureOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojisafety psychology;psychology in disaster;myth of panic2012 Conference of Japan Society of Civil Engineers2012/9/5~
International academic conferenceComparing Disaster Perceptions in Japan and the USOtherCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Shiotani, T.;Nakagawa, Y.psychological resilience;interdependence;trust;the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;online (web) survey;international comparison;USA;Japan2012/7/19~World Congress on Risk 2012: Risk and development in a changing world [Sydney]The Tohoku Disaster 3.11 with earthquake M9.0, tsunami, and the Fukushima accident brought the inhabitants horrible damages. And they showed remarkably disciplined behavior in the disaster. To investigate the Japanese mind in disaster, we carried out online (web) survey in Japan and the US on October and November 2011. At the Japan survey we focused on Tohoku area people [N=1,000], Tokyo people [N=500], Osaka people [N=500], and Kyushu people [N=500] (Total N=2,500) and the questionnaire was disigned to figure out the the people's responses to the disaster and their psychological factors. The US survey was nationwide and total of 830 people were targeted.
LectureOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiconsumer behavior;consumers' happiness;safety psychology44th Conference of Japan Association for Consumer Studies2012/6/12~
International academic conferenceCommunity and resilience in Tohoku, Japan after the disaster 3.11.OtherTSUCHIDA, Shojidisaster 3.11;resilience;cummunity2012/6/3~2nd Annual Asia Public Policy Forum: Disaster Management in Asia [Singapore]
PapersWhat is risk communication?: A suggestion by safety psychologyUnrefereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk communication;social psychologyThe Japanese Journal of Health Behavioral ScienceVol. 27: 10-192012/6~
LectureCommunity and resilience in Tohoku, Japan after the disaster 3.11OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojithe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;community;psychological resilience2nd Annual Asia Public Policy Forum: Disaster Management in Asia [Singapore]2012/5/15~
CommentaryThe Fukushima accident and crisis communicationUnrefereedIn-house publicationSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiNPP Fukushima-1 accident;crisis communicationSafety Science ReviewVol. 2: 14-152012/3/31~
PapersA report of a pilot implementation of Tutorial English classes at the Faculty of Safety Science: a two-part survey based on questionnaire-results UnrefereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredYamamoto, E.;TSUCHIDA Shoji;Mamoru OZAWA;Tomoyuki TAKAHASHI;Kenji KOSHIYAMA;Shigeru YAMANE;Yasuyuki SASAKI;Naoki IKENAGATutorial English;English education;oral communicationSafety Science ReviewVol. 2: 127-1382012/3/31~This paper summarizes participants' evaluations of the Tutorial English course offered
by Waseda University International Corporation, as a part of a pilot English program being considered by the Faculty of Safety Science, and implemented from February 21 to March 5, 2011. The fi rst part presents the results for the Tutorial English course in particular, with the second part showing those for learning in orthodox English courses. Both sets of results were obtained by means of questionnaires administered to the students participating.
PapersCrisis communication at the Fukushima accident and the concept of crisis managementIn refereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiNPP Fukushima-1 accident;crisis communicationJournal of the Atomic Energy Society of JapanVol. 54, No. 3: 181-1832012/3~
PapersAffective heuristic and linguistic representation in risk perception & judgmentIn refereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk judgments;perceived risk types;affect heuristic;good-bad criterion;linguistic representationTransactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical EngineersVol. 76 (No. 787): 374-3832012/3~
PapersEff ect of ingroup entitativity on attitude toward risk plantsIn refereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredSHIOTANI, Takamasa;TSUCHIDA,Shoji;TSUJIKAWA, Norifumiperceived ingroup enetitativity;risk plant;risk perception;interdependence heuristic;nuclear power plantSafety Science Reviewvol. 2, 49-572012/3~An abundance of psychological studies have been conducted on risk analysis, but a little is known about the effect of social relation factor, such as social connectedness and
interdependence among peoples. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of
inhabiting area and perceived ingroup entitativity of local community, which is defined as representation of social connectedness among inhabitants, on attitude toward nuclear power plants (NPP) as a subject of risk plant. Data used for this study were collected through the internet from 2,503 respondents as a part of nationwide social survey. The results of analysis showed the interaction effect that the higher group of perceived ingroup entitativity has more positive attitude toward NPP than lower group of it in respondents of NPP siting area. The result indicates the important role of social relation among peoples on forming attitude toward risk plants.
PapersCitizens', consumers', and foreigners' responses to the Fukushima accidentMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA Shoji;Hirose, Ythe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;consumer behavior;online (web) survey;students from abroad;universities;Tokyo;mail surveyFaculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Investgating the North-East Japan Disaster 2011", Minerva-Shobo253-2772012/2/10~
International academic conferenceCalm panic of the Japanese against the complex disaster 3-11.OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojithe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;the complex disaster 3-11;calm panic;the Japanese culture;social survey;mass media2011/12/6~Society for Risk Analysis, Annual meeting 2011 [Charleston,SC]On March 11th in 2011, huge earthquakes (M=9.0) attacked the northern part of Honshu (the main island of Japan). They caused the complex disaster with not only the quakes but also tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accidents. Immediately after the shocks most of the Japanese showed “calm panic”, i.e. they seemed to accept the tragedy. I had three hypotheses why the Japanese were in the calm panic. Hypothesis 1: the Japanese have equality oriented culture, and in the situation that everyone was suffering they would have thought it should be accepted. Hypothesis 2: the victims would have not yet come to the phase of reality perception. Hypothesis 3: the Japanese have strong sense of unity with nature, and they would have thought they had to accept what nature did because they were part of nature. A social survey was conducted to confirm the hypotheses in the connection of the effects of mass media.
Mechanism of human risk perceptionOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;risk judgments;social psychologyProceedings of safety science seminar 2010 (Graduate School of Safety Science, Kansai University)128-1382011/12~
Academic presentationOtherCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Shiotani, T.;Nakagawa, Y.the Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;perception of damages;community;NPP accident;online (web) survey2011/11/20~24th Annual Conference of Society for Risk Analysis, JapanThe Tohoku Disaster 3.11 with earthquake M9.0, tsunami, and the Fukushima accident brought the inhabitants horrible damages. Tohoku area people [N=1,000], Tokyo people [N=500], Osaka people [N=500], and Kyushu people [N=500] (Total N=2,500) were targeted at Online survey which was designed to figure out the people’s responses to the disaster and their psychological factors. The results showed that the Tohoku area people were in relatively solid local communities and bonded intimately each other. They thought it proper to cope with the disaster through community. They had more negative attitudes to Nuclear Power, and their trust toward the TEPCO and the government was more negative in dealing with the Fukushima accident.
LectureCrisis communication at the NNP-Fukushima-1 accidentOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiNPP Fukushima-1 accident;crisis communication2011/11/11~The 19th Atomic Energy System Symposium
International academic conferenceCrisis Communication & Management in the Fukushima AccidentOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiNPP Fukushima-1 accident;crisis communication2011/11/8~The 31st KAIF-JAIF Seminar on Nuclear Industry [Session: “PR and Communication Activities Hereafter”]
Academic presentationOtherCo-authoredKoshima, A.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiinterpersonal trust;risk perception2011/9/19~52nd Annual Conference of Japanese Society of Social Psychology
Academic presentationOtherCo-authoredShiotani, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiin-group entitativity;consensus of anxiety;accuracy of attitude estimation2011/9/19~52nd Annual Conference of Japanese Society of Social Psychology
LectureOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojithe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;social psychology;mass media;foreigners2011/9/13~Society for Risk Analysis, Annual meeting 2001: Risk analysis in an interconnected world39th conference of the Behaviormetric Society of Japan
LectureOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojithe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;rumor;web information;mass media;foreigners2011/9/5~5th International Confernce on Probabilistic Safty Assenssment and Management2011 Conference of Japanese Federation of Statistical Sceince Associations
Academic presentationOtherCo-authoredShiotani, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiin-group entitativity;collective efficacy;university safety2011/8/23~58th Conference of Japanese Society of Group Dynamics
International academic conferenceFactors influencing the motivation for considering nuclear power generationOtherCo-authoredTsujikawa, N.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Shiotani, T.motivation for considering;nuclear power generation2011/7/31~The 9th Biennial conference of Asian Association of Social Psychology [KunMing, China]
International academic conferenceThe effect of in-group entitativity on the collective efficacy and intention of activity in maintaining university safetyOtherCo-authorShiotani, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiin-group entitativity;collective efficacy;university safety2011/7/31~The 9th Biennial conference of Asian Association of Social Psychology [KunMing, China]
International academic conferenceCrisis communication at the Fukushima accident. (IN Panel Session "Impact to the Society")OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiNPP Fukushima-1 accident;crisis communication2011/7/27~The First China-Japan Conference on Risk Assessment and ManagementThe 26th Japan-Taiwan Nuclear Safety Seminar [Tokyo]
BookIntroduction to data-analysis for social surveys: Invitation to empirical sciences, New editionMonographCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Yamakawa,Esocial survey;questionnaire survey;statistical analysisYuhikaku1-2962011/7/10~
Chapter or Section"attitude scales", "attitude change"MonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, Shojiattitude scales;attitude changeK. Ninomiya & M. Koyasu (eds.), "Key-Word-Collection in Social Psychology", Shin-yo-sha102-1092011/6/30~
Keynote addressHuman risk perception and linguistic representationOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiaffect heuristic;good-bad criterion;linguistic representation;perceived risk types;risk judgments2011/6/23~The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, the 16th Symposium of Power and Energy Systems [Invited Lecture]
Keynote addressRisk communicationOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk communication;social psychology2011/6/12~The Japan Academy for Health Behavioral Science, the 26th conference [Invited Lecture]
PapersEffects of perceptions of the necessities and anxieties associated with nuclear power on motivation for considering nuclear power generationIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTsujikawa, N.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Shiotani, T.nuclear power generation;perception of necessity;anxiety;motivation for considering;risk communicationSociotechnicaVol. 8: 74-812011/4~The goal of this study was to examine the effects of the public perceptions toward necessities and anxieties associated with nuclear power on motivation of people to consider implementing nuclear power generation. In addition, differences in these effects were examined across areas at various distaces from nuclear power plants. Motivation for considering nuclear power generation was examined from two viewpoints: gathering information and discussion. The results suggested that perception of the necessities of nuclear power influence the gathering information motive, whereas anxieties influence the discussion motive. Perception of the necessities of nuclear power were found to have a stronger influenceon the gathering information motive among people living near a nuclear power plant than among people living far away from a nuclear power plant.
LectureHow do the Japanese feel and think about the Crisis?OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojithe Great East Japan Earthquake 2011;citizens' responsesKennedy School, Harvard University, Disaster Management in Asia Seminar Series [Japan in Crisis: Exploring the onsequences of a Cascading Disaster] [Boston, USA]2011/3/22~
BookRisk communicationMonographCo-authoredHirakawa, H.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsuchiya, T.risk communication;social psychologyOsaka University Press1-2202011/3/7~
PapersAffect Heuristic with "good-bad" Criterion and Linguistic Representation in Risk JudgmentsIn refereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiaffect heuristic;good-bad criterion;linguistic representation;perceived risk types;risk judgmentsJournal of Disaster ResearchVol. 6, No. 2: 219-2292011/3~Rational and normative risk judgments are made based on information on a risk object’s advantages and disadvantages, although many studies show that everyday heuristic risk judgment tends to be made based on limited information. I focused on the fact that affective heuristic (Slovic et al., 2004), one of the heuristic risk judgments, was affective judgment under “good-bad” criterion due to a trade-off in the perception of dangers and benefits, and showed by a social survey that female undergraduates in Japan and Eastern and Western Europe used the affect heuristic for various risk objects. In other words, an analysis of survey results on risk types perceived by female undergraduates inOsaka, London, Ljubljana, and Budapest showed that risk objects such as automobile driving, airplane travel, nuclear power plant, extremist group, and tobacco smoking were perceived as high-risk and low-return (Type 2) or low-risk and high-return (Type 3) [Study 1]. According to a tobacco smoking linguistic representation mail survey among university graduates of 24 to 71 years old in Japan, nonsmokers had relatively many adjectival and verbal linguistic representatives for tobacco smoking. This shows that affective risk judgment with a “good-bad” criterion was made by persons who perceived the risk object useless and the risk was taken involuntarily. [Study 2].
Research reportInter-cultural comparison between Japan and Nederland on risk & benefit perception toward foodsOtherCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;benefit perception;food safety;international comparisonProject Report97-992011/3~
PapersEmpirical research on risk literacy and perception of undergraduates in mainland China: A case of BSE.MonographInternational coauthorshipMa, H;Zhai, G;TSUCHIDA, ShojiChina;risk literacy;risk perception;BSE;undergraduatesC. Huang,, J. Ortiz and S. Sears(eds.), "Beyond Experience in Risk Analysis and Crisis Response", Atlantis Press233-2382011~
CommentaryIssues and review of risk psychologyMonographCo-authored chapterTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk psychology;safety scienceFaculty of Safety Science, Kansai University (ed.), "Science of Safety and ANSHIN", Sankei-Shinbun-Shuppan41-442010/4/26~
PapersThe BSE movement and the people's awareness of food safety in the Republic of KoreaUnrefereedIn-house publicationCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Shiotani, T.BSE movement;Korea;risk perception;questionnaire surveySurvey & Data Series No. 107 (Interpersonal relations and risks in the contemporary societies), Institute of Economic and Political studies, Kansai University1-352010/3/31~
PapersResearches at the Society for Risk Analysis, JapanIn refereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiresearches in risks;statistics of articles;statistics of oral presentations;SRA JapanJapanese Journal of Risk AnalysisVol. 19, No. 4: 11-192010/3/29~After a joint seminar and a symposium with the SRA leading researchers, the Society for Risk Analysis, Japan (SRA-Japan) started its activities in 1988. Researches at SRA-Japan have been considered to cover various risk-related research agenda of disaster, industrial accident, food & medicine, environment, biohazard & infection, chemicals, radiation, disposal, and social & economic risk. Risk researches would have their stages of risk identification, risk assessment, risk communication & perception, risk management & governance, and risk education. The research articles on the Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis (JJRA) and the oral presentations at Annual Conferences of SRA-Japan showed that chemical risk assessment, environmental and health risks, risk communication & perception, and risk management & governance were the major agenda of the researches. SRA-Japan would hope to develop more international and more interdisciplinary researches.
LectureRisk psychology as a risk analysisOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;risk judgments;risk communication;social psychology2010/3/10~Nanjing University [Nanjing]
PapersBeing canvassed for commodities futrures contracts and "trust" in the salespersons: Case studies of the victimsUnrefereedIn-house publicationSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, ShojiComodities Futures Contracts;trust;risk perception;thinking-variety-fading;psychological stress;interview surveyKansai University Psychological ResearchNo. 1: 25-402010/3~“Trust” is an important factor of human relations. Researches on trust so far have focused on the pro-social effects of it. However, “trust” is the key factor of swindling as well. Two intensive interviews were conducted to victims of Commodities Futures Contracts. The victims told that they were under psychological stress and could not help trusting the salespersons’ advices, and the advices led them to lost their money of tens millions yen. Their psychological processes were interpreted to be effected by the thinking-variety-fading. Under the difficult situations it would be hard for the victims to consider the situations and to come to realize the varieties of possible solutions. As a result only they could do was to depend on / trust “experts”.
PapersInformation transmission behavior of citizens after the risk messages were presentedIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTsujikawa, N.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Koike, F.;Tanigaki, T.;Nagaoka, Y.Information transmission behavior;Risk messages;Nuclear powerJapanese Journal of Risk AnalysisVol. 19, No. 4: 11-192009/12/25~Previous studies about presentation of risk messages have focused on the effects of recipients' attitude change. However, when we consider the influence social reality can have on risk perception and the necessity to communicate to the low-concern group, research into the communication process within the recipient group is also necessary. The purpose of this study was to examine information transmission behavior (intention of transmitting and transmission contents) of citizens after the risk messages were presented. For this study, the theme of risk message was nuclear power. Results showed that the intention of transmitting was high, to the degree that participants' attitudes were predictable. In addition, male participants' intention of transmitting was high to the degree of being predictable. However, female participants did not display any influence of predictable attitude. As for transmission contents, it was revealed that when participants watched a movie about shortage energy problems, participants tended to transmit information that promote nuclear power.
International academic conferenceThe infuluence of community entitativity on political trustOtherCo-authoredShiotani, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.community entitativity;political trust;questionnaire survey2009/12/12~8th Biennial Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology [Delhi]
International academic conferenceCross cultural/dietary study on risk/benefit perception of main food products between Japan and Western Countries.OtherCo-authoredSekizawa, J.;TSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;benefit perception;food safety;international comparison2009/12/9~Society for Risk Analysis, Annual meeting 2009 [Baltimore]
PapersMedia coverage of science and its relevance for the relationship to politicsMonographInternational coauthorshipPeters, H.P.;Brossard, D.;Cheveigne, S.;Dunwoody, S.;Heinrichs, H.;Jung, A.;Kallfass, M.;Miller, S.;Petersen, I.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Cain, A.;Paquez, A.science communication;biomedical researchers;media coverage of science;questionnaire survey;international comparisonHans Peter Peters (ed.), "Media orientation of biomedical researchers in international comparison: The interface of Science & journalism and their political Relevance", Forschungszentrums Jülich9-432009/12~
PapersBiomedical researchers' contacts with journalists and the public: an international comparison of experiences and attitudes in Germany, France, Great Britain, Japan and the USAMonographInternational coauthorshipPeters, H.P.;Brossard, D.;Cheveigne, S.;Dunwoody, S.;Kallfass, M.;Miller, S.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Cain, A.;Paquez, A.science communication;biomedical researchers;media coverage of science;questionnaire survey;international comparisonHans Peter Peters (ed.), "Media orientation of biomedical researchers in international comparison: The interface of Science & journalism and their political Relevance", Forschungszentrums Jülich45-992009/12~Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Young Scientists
Academic presentationVictems of commodities futrures contracts and risk perceptionOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojicommodities futrures contracts;victems;questionnaire survey;lawyers2009/10/10~Joint Conference of Japanese Society of Social Psychology (50th) and Japanese Society of Group Dynamics (56th)
PapersWhich has more effects on risk perception and judgments, Affect or Reason?: Effects of appeals in risk communicationIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Kinoshita, T.;Nakayachi, K.;Tanaka, Y.affective risk perception;rational risk perception;risk communication;attitude change;trustJapanese Journal of Risk AnalysisVol. 19, No. 2: 45-562009/7/9~When managing risks, people are often assumed to behave irrationally and emotionally. On risk
researches Slovic(1987,1999) pointed out the “emotion heuristics” which stress the emotional process of risk
judgments. However, some researchers (e.g. Behavioral Economy) argue that people’s behaviors are basically
very rational even though they have some irrational biases. And some researchers (Edwards, 1990; Edwards &
Hippel, 1995) suggested that rational appeals would influence on rational attitudes, while affective appeals would
influence on affective attitudes. On this research we focused on the judgment processes of risk communication,
and examined effects of rational-oriented-communication and emotional-oriented-communication on risk
acceptance and trust formation. Total of 542 students at 4 universities participated in 4-wave experimental
surveys in which risk communication toward MOX fuel using in nuclear power plants with rational or affective
appeals was presented. The results showed that rational appeal had effects on attitude changes, while affective
appeal had little effects.
PapersThe effects energy shortage information has on provider trust due to the primary attitude towards nuclear power: Experimental study on risk communicationIn refereedAcademic JournalCo-authoredTanigaki, T.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Koike, F.;Nagaoka, Y.risk communication;energy shortage information;trust and dependence;ability;prosocialityJapanese Journal of Risk AnalysisVol. 19, No. 2: 57-682009/7/9~An experimental study was conducted on the effects that information pertaining to possible lack of
energy may have on risk perception, risk judgments, and exploration of risk-related information. Three hundred
and twenty-three randomly-sampled individuals, aged between 20 and 59 years, living in the Osaka area (Japan)
participated in the experiment. During the experiment, participants watched either a video with images
portraying a society lacking electricity (experimental group) or a video without such images (control group).
Then, they freely explored a database consisting of scientific, technological, economic, social, and institutional
information on nuclear power generation. Participants’ risk perception of nuclear power generation and degree
of trust in the video and database producers, were measured using a questionnaire.
The results suggested that, in terms of risk communication, the trust of the receivers in the information
provider tends to increase. That is, when the provider presents convincing risk information, the receiver
tend to become increasingly afraid and dependent on the provider, and this tends to enhance his trust in the
latter. Moreover, the receiver’s trust in the provider was found, in the case of nuclear power generation, to be
determined by the expectation of the provider’s ability, but not directly, that is, through the expectation of the
latter’s prosociality.
Chapter or SectionAttitude and behaviorMonographSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiattitudes;social psychologyJapanese Society of Social Psychology (ed.) "Encyclopedia of social psychology", Maruzen84-852009/6~
International academic conferenceCharacteristics of Risk Communication in Japan and KoreaOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk communication;public sector;community sector;private sector;emotional risk communication;BSE movement in Korea;international comparisonAsian Conference on Risk Assessment and Management 20092009/5/18~Agents of prevention, hazard mitigation, and recovery against disaster are categorized into 1)public sector (local governments / national governments), 2)community sector, and 3)private sector (individual / family). It is necessary to have Disaster Risk Communication toward the decision makers of each sector from the experts of disaster prevention and recovery. In each sector, decision makers will have their peculiar psychological biases and the risk communication should be adjusted according to their peculiarity. In Japan today, community and family function countering disasters are diminishing and institutionalized voluntary aids (and individual’s decision making) are becoming relatively important. In every country, function of influential mass media and web information cannot be bypassed. On this paper characteristics of disaster risk communication will be presented citing the research on BSE movement in Korea (Tsuchida, Tsujikawa, Shiotani, Nam, and Shin, 2009) and the experiment of emotional risk communication in Japan (Tsuchida, Tsujikawa, Koike, Tanigaki, and Nagaoka ,2008).
PapersA social psychological discussion on risk perception and judgments: Including application to consumer behaviorsUnrefereedIn-house publicationSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;risk judgments;social psychologyAnnual Report 2008, Institute of Economic and Political Studies, Kansai University129-1382009/3/31~
International academic conferenceRisk perception of the Japanese: which has more effects on risk perception, affect or reason?In refereedOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk communication;affect;reason2008/12/29~Society for Risk Analysis, Annual meeting 2008 [Boston]Results of social surveys conducted in Japan for decades showed that the risk perception of the Japanese seemed to have changed when they experienced Kobe earthquake and bursting the babble economy, although they had some stable tendencies (e.g. middle-age female effect). On this presentation, I focus on the effects of affect and reason on the risk perception of the Japanese. In general, people are often assumed to behave irrationally and emotionally when they manage risks. Slovic (1987, 1999) pointed out the “emotion heuristics” which stress the emotional process of risk judgments. However, some researchers (e.g. Behavioral Economy: c.f. Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) argues that people’s behaviors are basically very rational even though they have some irrational biases. Two experimental surveys were carried out in 2007 in Japan on which we focused on the judgment processes of risk communication, and examined which would have stronger effects on risk acceptance and trust formation, rational-oriented-communication or emotional-oriented-communication. The results of them suggested that sufficient rational explanations would be necessary for the Japanese people at risk communications even when their judgment processes were influenced by their affects because of their trust formation.
LectureRisk researches in Japan: their globalization and locality (IN International Symposium "The Past and the Future of Risk Analysis")OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiinternational symposium;SRA Japan;researches in risks;analysis of articles2008/11/28~21st Annual Conference of Society for Risk Analysis, Japan [Osaka]
LectureWhat is the "reality" in researches of consumer behaviors?OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojiconsumer behaviors;reality perception;social psychology2008/11/21~37th Conference of Japan Association for Consumer Studies
Keynote addressHow do we think about risk?OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;psychology2008/11/7~Science Council of Japan, Symposium open to public (The Japnaese Society for Hygiene)
PapersScience-Media Interface: It's Time to ReconsiderIn refereedAcademic JournalInternational coauthorshipPeters, H.P.;Brossard, D.;Cheveigne, S.;Dunwoody, S.;Kallfass, M.;Miller, S.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiscience communication;scientists;media coverage of science;questionnaire survey;international comparisonScience Communicationvol. 30, No. 2: 266-2762008/11/1~An international mail survey of 1,354 biomedical researchers in five countries has revealed that interaction with the media is widespread among this group and that this interaction is largely perceived in a positive light. Possible reasons are offered as to why the perception persists that the scientist-journalist relationship remains troubled, despite the apparent reality. This reality may have negative as well as positive implications; the potential for too much control by the scientific community of media coverage about it, as well as that for too much media influence on inner-scientific processes, are also addressed.
International academic conferenceEffects of anxiety and disposition to trust in others on attitudes and information exploring behaviors in risk communication OtherCo-authoredTSUCHIDA, Shoji;Tsujikawa, N.;Koike, F.;Tanigaki, T.;Nagaoka, Y.risk communication;anxiety;trust;attitude formation2008/7/24~The XXIX International Congress of PsychologyThe XXIX International Congress of Psychology [Berlin]Effects of affective responses to information about insufficient energy supplies in the future (=fear) on trust to informants, risk perception, risk judgments, and risk information exploring behaviors were examined with a laboratory experiment. Three hundred and twenty-three individuals between 20 and 59 years old who lived in Osaka area, Japan were randomly sampled and participated in the experiment. At the experiment, participants watched a video putting fear of future insufficient energy supply into them (experiment condition) or a video explaining energy supply with no fear (control condition), and then they explored a database of nuclear power which consisted of scientific, technological, economic, social, and institutional information of nuclear power. Participants’ information exploring behaviors including the length of time spent, trust in people who made the video and the database, risk perception of nuclear power, and disposition to trust in other persons were measured and analyzed.
PapersInteractions with the Mass MediaIn refereedAcademic JournalInternational coauthorshipPeters, H.P.;Brossard, D.;Cheveigne, S.;Dunwoody, S.;Kallfass, M.;Miller, S.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiscience communication;scientists;media coverage of science;questionnaire survey;international comparisonSciencevol. 321: 204-2052008/7/11~Scientists and journalists get along much better than the anecdotal ‘horror stories’ would lead us to believe, according to new research published on 11 in the journal Science, which has found that 57% of researchers were ‘mostly pleased’ with the media interaction, while only 6% percent were ‘mostly dissatisfied’. Previous research as well as anecdotal evidence has tended to focus on the negative aspects of scientists’ media interaction, but today’s survey, based on the responses of 1354 scientists working in the high-profile research fields of epidemiology and stem cell research in the UK, US, France, Germany and Japan, suggests that, for the most part, scientists are comfortable dealing with journalists. The international team who produced the study asked the scientists how much they had to do with the media, and to evaluate their interactions with them, including whether they were ‘misquoted’ by ‘biased’ journalists, or whether they were able to ‘get their message out’. Across the five countries surveyed, some 70% of researchers had had at least one contact with a journalist or broadcaster in the last three years, and well over half said that they were generally pleased with the experience and its outcome, as against just 6% who said that they were displeased. Across the countries under study, scientist-journalist interactions were found not to be the province of a small set of scientific ‘media stars’ but an activity broadly rooted in the scientific community; nearly two thirds of the respondents had been interviewed by journalists at least once in the last three years, while nearly one in three reported more than five media contacts over the same period.
International academic conferenceCross-national differences in scientists' implicit models of public communication (IN symposium "Science and Media: A cross-national analysis of biomedical researchers' interactions with the media and the rol of organizational science PR.")UnrefereedOtherSingle-AuthorPeters, H.P.;TSUCHIDA, Shojiscience communication;biomedical researchers;media coverage of science;scientists' implicit models;questionnaire survey;international comparison2008/6/26~The International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST-10) [Malmo]
PapersJudgment of Public Acceptance of a Technology Accompanied by the Risk of Potential Disasters: Logic, emotion and valueUnrefereedAcademic JournalCo-authorNakayachi, K.;Tanaka, Y.;TSUCHIDA, Shoji;Kinoshita, T.risk perception;risk communication;experimental survey;nuclear power with MOX;studentsAnnual Report, Doshisha Research Center for Human SecurityNo.5: 35-502008/3/31~While complex technologies can benefit society, the benefits can be accompanied by the risk of potential disasters. How do lay citizens judge whether to accept or reject technologies that carry such risks? It is often said that judgments made by the public at large are irrational and based on emotion. Is the public therefore attracted by emotional messages? The present research approached this question b y conducting a communication experiment on the public judgment of electricity produced by thermal plutonium. Five hundred and six students responded to one of five NPO pamphlets explaining the technology. The results suggested that 1) emotion-oriented massages were less effective than factual ones, 2) participants did not clearly differentiate their values on which they made their judgments, and 3) participants whose judgments were well-grounded trusted the NPO based on a perceived similarity of values, while perception of the NPO's fairness was the bases for those who made judgments based on emotion. Finally, implications of these results for the practice of communication on technologies were discussed.
LectureThe concept of risk in the psychological viewpoint (IN symposium "Risk governance in sustainability")OtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk;psychology2008/3/6~1st China-Japan Science Forum on Environmental Changes, Bio-resources, and Global Warming [Beijing]
PapersVictems of commodities futrures contracts and their psychological processesUnrefereedAcademic JournalSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojicommodities futrures contracts;victems;questionnaire survey;lawyersJournal of Commodities Futrures Contracts VictemsNo.30: 25-342008/3~
CommentaryRisk related terms in psychologyMonographSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk terms;psychologyThe Society for Risk Analysis, Japan (ed.), "Dictionary of risk terms", Maruzen311-3122008/1/31~
LectureHow do we perceive and interpret risk?: Risk social psychologyOtherSingle-AuthorTSUCHIDA, Shojirisk perception;affect;heuristics2008/1/21~The Institute of Statistical Methematics (ISM), Symposium
Community Activities
- Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (member of the Committee for Social Surveys on Citizens' Attitudes to Nuclear Power) 1992~1996
- Tenth International Conference on AIDS (member of the Program Committee) 1993~1994
- Member of the HIV Prevention Research Committee by Health and Labour Research Grants 1994~2001
- Member of a Research Committee commissioned by Ministry of the Environment 1996~2001
- Atomic Energy Commission of Japan (Invited Speaker to Meetings on HLW) 1996~1998
- Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development (Member of a Research Committee)
- Japan Chemical Industry Association (Head of Committee on Risk-Communication) 1998~1999
- Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (member of the Committee for the Evaluation of Research and Development Issues) 1999~2005
- Suita City Cultural Promotion Foundation (Councilor) 2001~2003
- Japan Universities Association for Computer Education (Trustee) 2001~2003
- Nuclear Safety Research Association (Member of a research committee) 2001~2002
- Osaka Science and Technology Center (Member of a research committee)
- Nuclear Safety Research Association (Head of a research committee) 2003~2005
Research Activities Overseas
- Kansai University's Overseas Research Program(long term)Research Fellow 2002The United Kingdom Brunel University
- OtherBilateral Program Researcher, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 2005Slovenia Ljubljana University
- Kansai University's Overseas Research Program(short term)Research Fellow 2014The United States of America Kennedy School, Harvard University
Participation in International Conferences
- Third International Conference on AIDS in Asia and the Pacific 1995
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 18th Annual conference 1995
- The First China-Japan Conference on Risk Assessment and Management 1998
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 24th Annual conference 2001
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 25th Annual conference 2002
- International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology: Sixth European Regional Congress 2003
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 26th Annual conference 2003
- 28th International Congress of Psychology 2004
- International Joint Conference on Risk Assessment and Management 2004
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 27th Annual conference 2004
- International Forum on Risk Perception and Communication, Korean Society for Risk Governance 2005
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 28th Annual conference 2005
- The 9th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology 2006
- Society for Risk Analysis - Europe 15th Annual Conference 2006
- 173rd National Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 2007
- The Korean Society of Environmental Toxicology, annual conference 2007 2007
- Society for Risk Analysis, The 30th Annual conference 2007
- 1st China-Japan Science Forum on Environmental Changes, Bio-resources, and Global Warming 2008
- 2nd World Congress on Risk 2008
- The XXIX International Congress of Psychology 2008
- Society for Risk Analysis, Annual Meeitng 2008 2008
Courses Taught
- Risk Perception
- Risk Communication
- Practical exercise of Societal Safety Sciences
- Advanced Seminar I
- Advanced Seminar II
- Graduation Thesis I
- Graduation Thesis II
- Risk Communication
- Seminar IVA(Psychology of Social Safety)
- Seminar IVB(Psychology of Social Safety)
- AI and Data Science - Experiences -
- Introduction to Safety Science II
- Personal Information
- Research Activities
- Research Activities
- Community Service
- Courses Taught